Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Constrictor for Wet 'n' Wild


  • Please log in to reply
177 replies to this topic

#1 ads086

ads086
  • Members
  • 357 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:05 PM

Wet N Wild posted a picture of a crocodile's eye on Facebook today, with a comment about it coming soon and mentioned a length of 166.7m Does anyone have any ideas as to what this may be?
IOU: 1xSignature...

#2 reanimated35

reanimated35

    Don't read this.

  • Members
  • 2,815 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Park Count:24
  • Ride Count:102

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:25 PM


A crocodile is any species belonging to the family Crocodylidae (sometimes classified instead as the subfamily Crocodylinae). The term can also be used more loosely to include all extant members of the order Crocodilia: i.e. the true crocodiles, the alligators and caimans (family Alligatoridae) and the gharials (family Gavialidae), as well as the Crocodylomorpha, which include prehistoric crocodile relatives and ancestors.

Member species of the family Crocodylidae are large aquatic reptiles that live throughout the tropics in Africa, Asia, the Americas and Australia. Crocodiles tend to congregate in freshwater habitats such as rivers, lakes, wetlands and sometimes in brackish water. They feed mostly on vertebrates - fish, reptiles, and mammals, and sometimes on invertebrates - molluscs and crustaceans, depending on species. They first appeared during the Eocene epoch, about 55 million years ago.

Reanimation Imagery

 

Any post made by me is either my opinion, made up, or based off memory and therefore my not be 100% accurate. It does also not represent the view of my employer or anyone else other than me. If you share the opinion however, go us!


#3 mba2012

mba2012

    ...

  • Members
  • 496 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:SEQ
  • Interests:Parks, Rides, Aviation, Lego, Computers
  • Park Count:7
  • Ride Count:54

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:29 PM

A terror canyon replacement? Just a suggestion as my first post in months.
Cheers,
mba2012

Good Luck to anyone participating in the Parkz Creative Challenge!!

#4 MacPark

MacPark
  • Members
  • 149 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Park Count:28

Posted 25 July 2012 - 05:47 PM

heres hoping it is that.

#5 alex_1

alex_1

    srsly guise

  • Members
  • 705 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunshine Coast

Posted 25 July 2012 - 07:04 PM

Village Roadshow seem to be churning out new attractions at their parks! The eye looks more like a snake's eye than a crocodile's to me. That would be a much more plausible theme for a waterslide. From the report of it being 199m long I'm expecting it could be one of those "Watercoaster" type slides like the one White Water World has. That would be an awesome addition.

Edited by alex_1, 25 July 2012 - 09:15 PM.


#6 BemaniAK

BemaniAK
  • Members
  • 137 posts

Posted 25 July 2012 - 08:04 PM

A terror canyon replacement? Just a suggestion as my first post in months.

Yes please, walking up the flumes and seeing that dirty empty space is almost as bad as the Bermuda Triangle load dock.

#7 themeparkgc

themeparkgc
  • Members
  • 861 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 July 2012 - 09:03 AM

From the report of it being 199m long I'm expecting it could be one of those "Watercoaster" type slides like the one White Water World has. That would be an awesome addition.

It actually says 166.7m. Super Tubes Hydrocoaster is 236m and if Wet'n'Wild only got one 166.7m in length, I think I'd be bit annoyed. For a park the size of WnW it needs a bit more. If WnW did get a water coaster though, I would really love to see them get a dueling master blaster like their sister park in Phoenix.

#8 alex_1

alex_1

    srsly guise

  • Members
  • 705 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sunshine Coast

Posted 26 July 2012 - 03:51 PM

Sorry, I meant 166. And oh ok, that does sound a bit short.

#9 mattcrombie

mattcrombie
  • Members
  • 522 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles, California

Posted 30 July 2012 - 11:05 AM

Could be one of these: http://3.bp.blogspot...ot-original.jpg or something similar. I will try and find out some more info
If you can dream it, you can do it.
--Walt Disney

#10 DazzaMoes

DazzaMoes

    dazza

  • Members
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:24 PM

480715_10151142074636081_777792666_n.jpg

I’m 18.37m high and on my way to Wet’n’Wild.....I dont think its a Croc going by this picture just posted on Wet'n'Wild's FB page


Edited by DazzaMoes, 30 July 2012 - 12:25 PM.


#11 jjuttp

jjuttp

    Creeper

  • Members
  • 947 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Pacific Ocean
  • Interests:Photography, Music, animals, and Games
  • Park Count:17
  • Ride Count:104

Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:55 PM

The skin looks more like a Carpet (Python)

BUSHPosted ImageRESCUE


#12 themeparkgc

themeparkgc
  • Members
  • 861 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:08 PM

Could be one of these: http://3.bp.blogspot...ot-original.jpg
or something similar.

I personally would be against a King Cobra because it seems a bit too similar to the Kamikaze and because of its capacity issues. I'm thinking a White Water West Family Anaconda/Python/Rattler would be a nice fit.

#13 Original

Original
  • Members
  • 481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NSW, Australia

Posted 30 July 2012 - 06:13 PM

This is great news, and surprising, I really wasn't expecting to see something from WnW and didn't really think they needed anything, but nonetheless we'll gladly take it. It means VRTP have basically got something new coming to each of their parks in the next year and a bit if the water coaster is for SW! Also, I'm really liking how VRTP are utilising social media to create anticipation about upcoming attractions, unlike when we would something get built with no mention that it was actually there until it was basically open <_< Slightly off topic, but I'd really like to see them update one of their Mammoth slides, keep one side open, but enclose the other, add some lighting effects and music, I think it would make two different experiences, for what is two of the same slide.

#14 buzzkill13

buzzkill13
  • Members
  • 48 posts

Posted 30 July 2012 - 07:28 PM

Pretty obvious where it's going but driving past today i noticed what looks like construction in it's early stages immediately behind the old terror canyon drop zone with alot of dirt which i'm pretty sure wasn't there before. I'm excited to see a new ride for Wet 'n Wild and i'm impressed with VRTP for their wise decisions on new attractions..

Slightly off topic, but I'd really like to see them update one of their Mammoth slides, keep one side open, but enclose the other, add some lighting effects and music, I think it would make two different experiences, for what is two of the same slide.

I think that is a brilliant idea! It would give a great effect to a somewhat outdated water ride. How old is that thing anyway?

#15 AlexB

AlexB

    Banned

  • Members
  • 4,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane South
  • Park Count:31
  • Ride Count:118

Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:13 PM

Which side? One side is newer than the other - being that the old mammoth 'fall' slide got sent to SWRWP a few years back and replaced with another (mirror) river. TLC channel had a 'waterparks' special a few months back - showed a bowl slide fully enclosed with disco lights etc - was very well done. Mammoth would be a bit harder - as riders aren't in the same spot for very long...

THERE'S A WORLD I'D LIKE TO LIVE IN, A WORLD I'D LIKE TO SEE
WHERE'S THERE'S TOO MUCH FUN FOR EVERYONE, AND STILL LOTS LEFT FOR ME
WHERE THERES MAGIC ON EVERY CORNER, AND A SMILE ON EVERY FACE
IF I COULD JUST GET OUT OF THIS PERFECT DREAM, INTO THIS PERFECT PLACE...

Wouldn't It be Wonderful, If the World Still Had Wonderland?


#16 Gazza

Gazza

    Double Click Hyperlinks

  • Community Leader
  • 8,331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Park Count:42
  • Ride Count:420

Posted 31 July 2012 - 02:28 PM

Both the old Terror Canyon slides are gone completley.

#17 GoGoBoy

GoGoBoy
  • Members
  • 2,356 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 31 July 2012 - 03:28 PM

Wow. Village are just going for it aren't they! Good on them. I didn't even think a new attraction for WnW was necessary right now, especially considering all the stuff going in at the other parks. But happy to see it anyway! I just can't get over how much capex they must be going through right now. Great stuff. It will be well and truly worth a trip to the Gold Coast next year thanks to Village and that's an understatement

#18 Original

Original
  • Members
  • 481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NSW, Australia

Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:05 PM

Which side? One side is newer than the other - being that the old mammoth 'fall' slide got sent to SWRWP a few years back and replaced with another (mirror) river.

That was my point, since both slides mirror one another keep one out in the open, enclose the other! I know one is newer than the other, but I don't think it really matters which one is enclosed, they both do the same thing. But it could bring life to an older ride and draw people to that side of the park, especially so the other side doesn't become clogged with people if that is where the new slide goes, having Aqualoop and the new addition. Question as well, but if the ride is taking the old Terror Canyon site, what will happen to the Zip Line? Is it in the way and will have to go, or are they going to be able to build around?

#19 Gazza

Gazza

    Double Click Hyperlinks

  • Community Leader
  • 8,331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Park Count:42
  • Ride Count:420

Posted 31 July 2012 - 04:25 PM

Is it in the way and will have to go, or are they going to be able to build around?

Check out Nearmaps i suppose: http://www.nearmap.c...38;nmd=20120614 ...Looks like they wont interfere.

Edited by Gazza, 31 July 2012 - 04:26 PM.


#20 AlexB

AlexB

    Banned

  • Members
  • 4,353 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane South
  • Park Count:31
  • Ride Count:118

Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:25 PM

I personally would be against a King Cobra because it seems a bit too similar to the Kamikaze and because of its capacity issues. I'm thinking a White Water West Family Anaconda/Python/Rattler would be a nice fit.

TPGC - I think you might be onto something here - anyone see what WnWP got in last year???

I'm just spitballing here - but the theme seems to fit too...
http://wetnwildphoen...Constrictor.htm

Here's the product page...
http://www.whitewate...tor_tubing.html

THERE'S A WORLD I'D LIKE TO LIVE IN, A WORLD I'D LIKE TO SEE
WHERE'S THERE'S TOO MUCH FUN FOR EVERYONE, AND STILL LOTS LEFT FOR ME
WHERE THERES MAGIC ON EVERY CORNER, AND A SMILE ON EVERY FACE
IF I COULD JUST GET OUT OF THIS PERFECT DREAM, INTO THIS PERFECT PLACE...

Wouldn't It be Wonderful, If the World Still Had Wonderland?


#21 Gazza

Gazza

    Double Click Hyperlinks

  • Community Leader
  • 8,331 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Park Count:42
  • Ride Count:420

Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:31 PM

^I reckon half of these new slides made by Whitewater West are just an excuse to sell more fibreglass. The tunnel is wider, but its not like a raft is ever gonna go anywhere near the top.Anaconda and Python being the best examples.I think their tornado rip-off, the Abyss, is the most Blatant: http://www.whitewate....com/Abyss.html

The dinosaur this park decided to stick on top is a nice touch:
Posted Image

And I'm presuming the "Curl" version they make is to avoid infringing on Proslides patents:
Posted Image

Slightly ontopic, but See the other thing WnWP got too, a baby sized version of Tornado, how cute!http://wetnwildphoen.../WetnWildJr.htm

Edited by Gazza, 31 July 2012 - 06:40 PM.


#22 BemaniAK

BemaniAK
  • Members
  • 137 posts

Posted 03 August 2012 - 01:44 AM

Slightly off topic, but I'd really like to see them update one of their Mammoth slides, keep one side open, but enclose the other, add some lighting effects and music, I think it would make two different experiences, for what is two of the same slide.

That creates problems with running the ride, when the slide's popularity started to dwindle that was when they sent the mammoth plunge to SeaWorld Resort, having both sides be mirrored identical slides meant that on quiet days they could close one side and not have any guests complaining that they want to ride the other. With the rides even lower popularity I doubt they'll be changing that now.

#23 DazzaMoes

DazzaMoes

    dazza

  • Members
  • 33 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 August 2012 - 10:22 AM

With the rides even lower popularity I doubt they'll be changing that now.

If they changed it up a bit, the popularity of the ride would increase as people would want to experience the new side of it.

#24 Original

Original
  • Members
  • 481 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:NSW, Australia

Posted 03 August 2012 - 12:08 PM

The park in winter also runs alternate slides. One slide for one hour, then another for an hour. Why couldn't they just do the same as they do with their other slides?

#25 BemaniAK

BemaniAK
  • Members
  • 137 posts

Posted 05 August 2012 - 06:29 PM

The park in winter also runs alternate slides. One slide for one hour, then another for an hour. Why couldn't they just do the same as they do with their other slides?

Simply put, complaints.

If they changed it up a bit, the popularity of the ride would increase as people would want to experience the new side of it.

However in winter it would still be completely barren. I happened to inquire through Email when the Mammoth Plunge was moved to Seaworld, they specifically stated "issues with running 2 different slides during winter months" was their reasoning.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users