Melbourne theme park?
#1
Posted 11 September 2012 - 03:15 PM
I found this, from 2008, was this still going to happen? or what?
http://www.heraldsun...x-1111115985133
#2
Posted 11 September 2012 - 03:33 PM
Melbournites will have to be satisfied with Luna Park for now
#3
Posted 11 September 2012 - 03:56 PM
#4
Posted 11 September 2012 - 05:00 PM
#5
Posted 11 September 2012 - 09:57 PM
#6
Posted 11 September 2012 - 10:04 PM
Sydney would likely see a theme park (non-water park) before Melbourne.
#7
Posted 12 September 2012 - 09:09 PM
#8
Posted 23 September 2012 - 03:00 PM
#9
Posted 25 September 2012 - 05:52 PM
#10
Posted 25 September 2012 - 11:31 PM
#11
Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:04 AM
BUSH
RESCUE
#12
Posted 26 September 2012 - 11:19 AM
Hi Josef
Thanks for your email. It is great to hear that our valued customers enjoy the things we are so passionate about.
Thanks for your feedback about Melbourne and Sydney. Our directors continue to look for new opportunities and one day it may be Melbourne.
Keep enjoying our parks.
Best regards
Village
#13
Posted 26 September 2012 - 01:28 PM
#14
Posted 26 September 2012 - 09:52 PM
-Noise complaints from surrounding residents in Southbank, and reduced amenity for people staying at Crown (Crown seems more positioned as a luxury entertainment product, not a go wild/have fun type thing like Vegas)
-Limited space to actually build anything good.
-No space for future expansion to keep guests coming back.
Side point, I'm interested to know what this "elsewhere" location is for the tennis courts and the hotel gardens? "Somewhere" I presume?
#15
Posted 27 September 2012 - 10:49 AM
#16
Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:18 PM
#17
Posted 27 September 2012 - 11:34 PM
Edited by Jobe, 27 September 2012 - 11:36 PM.
#18
Posted 12 October 2012 - 08:17 PM
#19
Posted 13 October 2012 - 06:32 PM
#20
Posted 13 October 2012 - 07:50 PM
All the Govt is doing is a feasiblity/routing study into both of them
Difficult to see the Avalon one getting up...I don't really see why the hourly capacity of rail is warranted when a bus with a suitable interior layout (See Skybus)
Also don't get why Avalon needs to go international. Why does Vic need two international airports so close together? It's not London!
#21
Posted 13 October 2012 - 08:31 PM
Not Tulla.Also the other major airports in Melbourne are located in suburban areas with limited room for expansion
Which is the big problem with the proposal IMO.Avalon Rail-link would branch off from the Geelong line.
One station branch lines are always difficult to serve in terms of stopping patterns (See here)
If they slewed the whole Geelong line allignment towards the airport, and made it a through station that would be a practical operating model, but a one station branch dangling of the mainline is a crappy way of running things.
On the contrary, thats why I don't see it getting up. Because a bus would be so much simpler and quicker.Lara station is already pretty close(short bus ride), so it's pretty hard from that point of view not seeing the project go ahead.
Google Maps says it's 11 mins from Lara...Could easily work that with a fleet of 3 or so buses.
#22
Posted 13 October 2012 - 09:32 PM
Seeing as they have parks in other parts of the world where it snows for half a year. I don't see the climate of Melbourne being an issue. Not even for a water park. But definitely not for an amusement park.it is a shame, with such a large population and suitable surrounding areas for a theme park you would have thought it would have been done by now. i guess it probably doesn't have the suitable climate here tho for parks huh
I don't think a rooftop theme park would fly, for a number of reasons. I think inner city locations are a poor choice for theme parks...Much better to pick a location with plenty of land surrounding. I feel this way because:
-Noise complaints from surrounding residents in Southbank, and reduced amenity for people staying at Crown (Crown seems more positioned as a luxury entertainment product, not a go wild/have fun type thing like Vegas)
-Limited space to actually build anything good.
-No space for future expansion to keep guests coming back.
Side point, I'm interested to know what this "elsewhere" location is for the tennis courts and the hotel gardens? "Somewhere" I presume?
I agree, it would be much more successful if you put it in a place far from dense civilisation. In this country that isn't something we don't have. If you built in a populated area, there would be serious restriction problems, just take a look at the Luna Parks (Sydney and Melbourne.)
#23
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:03 PM
#24
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:14 PM
Qantas might be tied to the place, but unless consumers are actually buying seats on the flights there the airport wont grow!
#25
Posted 15 October 2012 - 09:38 AM
You still haven't said where the consistent every day demand is, other than an airshow for a few days every 2 years (potentially annually)
How much of the attendance would come from direct international flights?
Foam.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












