Shaunernator

I honestly think that talking about IP addresses and internet servers revealing people's information is taking it all a little too far. All I was trying to suggest was that there is no point in pretending to be someone you're not.

We had to look at the consequences of every move we made. Sure, one option could have been to leave both parks open and get an equal(ish) number of patrons to each area, both WhiteWaterWorld and the Blue Lagoon, but we also had a look at the other side. We also thought that we could close Blue Lagoon temporarily, and therefore lure people who are wanting to go on a water ride or go in a pool to WhiteWaterWorld, boosting the first day attendance numbers of the park. But like I said before, Blue Lagoon wasn't to be open for more than 2 weeks after the opening of WhiteWaterWorld, so I'm not quite sure why it would still be closed. My guess would be that at the time the user 'Dreamworld' noticed that Blue Lagoon was closed, it was closed for daily/weekly maintainence, or closed for refurbishment. I haven't been informed of permanent closure, so I don't think that's it.

No, the bulletin was correct. The ride will be named the Mick Doohan Motor Coaster.

Some theming is yet to be completed, however due to legal reasons, of course it is clearly impossible to display logos and/or advertisements showing any part of a cigarette company or cigarettes themselves. Therefore, no, the ride won't be completely accurate, but keep in mind that ultimately, the ride is about the ride and not about the painting, the paint only makes it look better ; )

It was designed that way to become more readable to people who couldn't understand what was what and where everything was. Basically, it was designed to be more user-friendly.

Blue Lagoon, like smash210 said, was shut down for the opening of WhiteWaterWorld....however, it strikes me as odd that it would still be closed. Ity was only to be shut down temporarily for 2 weeks after the opening of WhiteWaterWorld, so I'm not quite sure why it would still be closed...I'll have to get on to the maintainence personnel. And it was closed because, once again, like smash210 said, we didn't want any unneeded competition between the Blue Lagoon are and WWW. Basically, it was to lure people to WWW because the object was to take away one of the water park areas to attract people to the other. Simple as that : D

The "So Many Worlds in One" jingle that we use was specifically made and specially prepared for use only by Dreamworld. The music isn't available to buy or to download and is funnily enough only 13 seconds long. The process of the looping is just your ordinary music morpher or mp3 program which our music engineers and technicians use. Basically it's just a very small, short snippet of music to define the park. But no, it's not available. Sorry.

The comment from Gazza about parks overseas releasing images and details about the rides is true, however in, and you should know this, in Australia, or more specifically Dreamworld in this topic, there are various changes and alterations to rides being built, so much so that the specific detailing of the rides is nearly impossible to release until the ride has actually been completed and has been run through and passed testing. ash.1111, if you had made comments about the "Dreamworld Ride Op" having a part in the false information being given out, you were obviously very observant about both the information he/she was giving out and your own knowledge about the theme park industry, and you obviously compared them to find substantial differences. I will say though, in regard to a topic suggesting that as long as you keep your confidentiality and do not release information about yourself or the area of work you do at the park, I thought that was quite a good idea, however the more I think about it, the less likely that seems to be able to work. I know for certain that whenever a worker at Dreamworld is caught doing something wrong, whether their name is known or not, the management here, includig myself, are told to keep an eye out for anything that may be going on. On these forums, I'm not going to dictate what people can and can't say, definitely not. All I am trying to do is to keep people out of trouble. But like one of the replies stated, if the people on here want to make unjust statements and put their jobs on the line, go ahead. Oh, and by the way. I'm not going to be like a Dreamworld management officer on here, ok? Just in case anyone gets the vibe that I'm going to be all macho and try to put myself in a position of authority. No.

Hey, if that's the way it works here, awesome. I'm just trying to keep people outta trouble, yeah? And yep, I work at Dreamworld in management. Not like corporate boss or anything (lol) but yeh, with the management. Anyway, I agree with mattcrombie. Keep yourself confidential and roll with it.

Who are all these people claiming to work at Dreamworld and are giving away information that clearly everyone, besides possibly them, knows that the information they are conveying, whether it be true or false, is definitely not allowed. Now I can state that I work with the management of Dreamworld and I am surely not going to go and boast about it, pretending I know all and I can share all. The information I am asked by Macquarie Leisure and by the corporate heads of Dreamworld to share with Dreamworld staff is by all means confidential and not to be released via any medium, including these forums. The user calling themselves "Dreamworld Ride Op" is sharing information that is extremely false. I need to make it quite clear that although there are people registered on here as ride operators, engineers, what have you, and people like me, who work at Dreamworld management, are not allowed to make any statements that are not yet confirmed or not yet safe to release.

Umm, are you sure you are in a position to give away information on the ride? If you are, ok then. But if not, rethink what info you give out...it might get you into trouble