Jump to content

Aussie World’s SX360 Eventual Opening


strop
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, strop said:

I came across a question and response on Facebook in regards to the SX360 opening. Had to laugh that they went with “that line” but glad they went on to expand on it:

 

3AF48381-4F8B-4276-A0F4-4C5A957DB41F.png

That is very funny for soooo many reasons. 

It also appears that this post has been removed from the page as well. Interesting!!

Thanks for posting!!

Edited by Jobe
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StingRay said:

Given some of the recent changes within the industry, I don't see this as a major issue. I mean look at SV. It's been delayed due to pretty much the same issues. 

So we can stop putting the blame on Dreamworld for not opening it on time? Also, did DC Rivals have to go through this new process when it opened or is this in relation to the new amusement laws that have come into place only this year?

Work Health and Safety (Amusement Devices – Public Safety) Amendment Regulation 2019 - https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/workplace-health-and-safety-laws/laws-and-legislation/work-health-and-safety-amusement-devices-public-safety-amendment-regulation-2019

Edited by Gold Coast Amusement Force
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gold Coast Amusement Force said:

So we can stop putting the blame on Dreamworld for not opening it on time? Also, did DC Rivals have to go through this new process when it opened or is this in relation to the new amusement laws that have come into place only this year?

Work Health and Safety (Amusement Devices – Public Safety) Amendment Regulation 2019 - https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/workplace-health-and-safety-laws/laws-and-legislation/work-health-and-safety-amusement-devices-public-safety-amendment-regulation-2019

People will obviously want to blame DW but the changes have the regulations have changed during that rides construction. Same here for Aussie World. These changes have occurred at a time that is unfortunate for the parks. Due to the transition in the regulations.

Rivals did not have to go through this new process. It was lucky. But SeaWorld's new ride line up will go through it. In fact, any new rides in the future in QLD will go through these processes, unfortunately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Jdude95 said:

We're also hearing of it a lot more in QLD because that's the main epicentre for theme parks and rides in the country.

100%. Plus given the circumstances as to why all those changes occurred. I mean some people have a fear of rides in QLD.

Back on track. This will be a nice little addition to aussie world. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add a little further to the discussion, Aussie World still are not releasing the opening date for the SX360.  The impending arrival of the new spinning Wild Mouse coaster is at hand but this will not open until next year- when next year is open to conjecture. Are they anticipating delays before this is even built perhaps?

image.png.70906e705087a9aacd1db8775cf7218f.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HussRainbow87 said:

It's a good thing, but when they go too hard on people who are being 150% compliant, its a bit ridiculous.

Rules are rules. Heck, I've raced cars semi-professionally. But still, I had to sit the same driving test as everyone else. It's good for the theme park/amusement park industry that these new standards exist. It helps build industry confidence again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StingRay said:

Rules are rules. Heck, I've raced cars semi-professionally. But still, I had to sit the same driving test as everyone else. It's good for the theme park/amusement park industry that these new standards exist. It helps build industry confidence again.

Never said anybody is disregarding these rules because they are safe. You just have to look at it in a way where many of these people who work doing safety audits are not around amusement rides every day, that goes for parks and travelling machines. Just how it is I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HussRainbow87 said:

Never said anybody is disregarding these rules because they are safe. You just have to look at it in a way where many of these people who work doing safety audits are not around amusement rides every day, that goes for parks and travelling machines. Just how it is I guess.

I get how people look at this and can be like "they don't work with the rides they don't know what they do". Essentially a ride is classified as heavy plant machinery. So with some engineering drawings, an engineer (like these specialist are) can easily assume and ascertain if the plant equipment is indeed doing what it is designed for.

The issue is not enough "inspectors" exist currently. But over time this will be built up meaning a new ride coming on the scene in a few years time shouldn't have as many delays assay today.

I agree that it hasn't been executed properly but like I already mentioned give it time and things will get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StingRay said:

It's good for the theme park/amusement park industry that these new standards exist. It helps build industry confidence again.

Yeah, but considering the new laws were brought in during/after the planning/construction phases of this ride (and SV), you would like to think the State Government would be working with the parks to help them strike between the shifted goalposts, especially Aussie World, you are an innocent party in the whole thing. I have less sympathy for Dreamworld, who have created this whole shitfight.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StingRay said:

I get how people look at this and can be like "they don't work with the rides they don't know what they do". Essentially a ride is classified as heavy plant machinery. So with some engineering drawings, an engineer (like these specialist are) can easily assume and ascertain if the plant equipment is indeed doing what it is designed for.

The issue is not enough "inspectors" exist currently. But over time this will be built up meaning a new ride coming on the scene in a few years time shouldn't have as many delays assay today.

I agree that it hasn't been executed properly but like I already mentioned give it time and things will get better.

Yeah I totally agree, I think these people need to work more with operators and owners instead of going against them and being harsh because of a stigma. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strop said:

Yeah, but considering the new laws were brought in during/after the planning/construction phases of this ride (and SV), you would like to think the State Government would be working with the parks to help them strike between the shifted goalposts, especially Aussie World, you are an innocent party in the whole thing. I have less sympathy for Dreamworld, who have created this whole shitfight.

Why shift the goal post for one company?. I'm sorry that's just crap. You have a road rule change and it's not like the state government does a rollout based on when people got their license. I am happy no company has received special treatment. Imagine what other companies would think or even the public then.

Youll find the regulators are working with the parks. Things take time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 05/07/2019 at 8:46 PM, Gold Coast Amusement Force said:

So we can stop putting the blame on Dreamworld for not opening it on time?

 

On 05/07/2019 at 8:52 PM, StingRay said:

People will obviously want to blame DW 

 

On 05/07/2019 at 8:52 PM, StingRay said:

These changes have occurred at a time that is unfortunate for the parks. 

 

@Gold Coast Amusement Force @StingRayplease list the "changes" that have screwed over SV?

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
7 hours ago, Skeeta said:

@Gold Coast Amusement Force @StingRayplease list the "changes" that have screwed over SV?

Obviously, I don't know all the details of the new code. But it is kinda obvious that's where some of the issues have stemmed from. When you look at this case they started building. Got the job done then it seemed issues have arisen due to changes in the code. I am sure someone here would be much closer to the situation than myself.

Sure the signing of the process can take a while (I have witnessed this first hand in this industry) but I think the changes in the code really hit DW at a bad time. Same goes here for AW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.