Jump to content

Themeparkfan

Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Themeparkfan

  1. They are most probably replacing all the of the flume I don't think much of the flume tubes have been replaced since the 70s. (As far as I'm aware)  minus the area around storm /Bermuda Which has been rerouted a few times over the years 

  2. 26 minutes ago, webslave said:

    ROI = Return on investment.

    Personally, given the likelihood of having the area closed off for so long it would be too tempting to use the time to remove TRR and the SBNO mine ride and start fresh with the area.

    I totally agree  I can't see gold rush country reopening the way it is now with 3 SBNO gold rush attractions eureka skylink and now TRR and the incident now attached to it.  I think they will either demolish the current ride system for TRR replace it with a new intamin system With a new name 

    or demolish everything minus buzz saw and possibly retheme the whole area  but I think the first option would be the cheaper and more logical way to go 

  3. 5 minutes ago, Richard said:

    Though the cause of the 1979 fire at Luna Park was never determined, the general consensus is either arson or electrical faults. Neither of these really fall into what I would class as a typical theme park incident, in the same way that a tidal wave or meteorite wouldn't be classed as a theme park incident.

    Absolutely not. They would be completely liable in this scenario.

    Really? I thought The manufacturer would then be liable if it was a factory flaw ?

  4. the thing is that with the smiler incident the people survived  with the Rapids incident were looking at one of the worst the theme park accidents to have occurred globally. In recent times  4 tragic deaths  which could have very very huge consequenses at best it's a computer / manufacturer malfunction and clears dreamworld and ardent  of any wrong doing at worst it's a maintenance neglect issue or a human error issue someone will get charged with neglect for public safety and 4 counts of manslaughter this is why I believe ardent and dreamworld are keeping very quiet about the incident until the investigation is complete  but I do agree Deborah should have reached out to the families much earlier than she did 

  5. If anything I think in the long term the whole area of gold rush country will be boarded up out of view

    the rest of the park will reopen with the obvious exception of buzzsaw while they figure out what to do with the ride. I speculate it either  gets bulldozed and  replaced or the whole area will possibly  get  re-themed but that could turn out to be too expensive however I can't imagine them reopening the same ride system ever again 

  6. I think it is sad they are removing the barn building its part of Dreamworld history  however I understand why  that building when first designed in the 80s was intended not only  as a "exit through the gift shop " but as a coach stop and tourist information centre  on your way into the Gold Coast  as time progressed larger truck stops and service stations  made it obsolete for that purpose  and has become the token  "exit through the gift shop"  so I think it's great they are finding a better purpose for it  shame they could not retain the external facade though 

  7. 6 minutes ago, reanimated35 said:

    Why would you want them to spend several million on relocating a ride instead of buying a new one. Just think how long the empty space will then have to sit there because they wasted their capital on pointlessly moving the ride. 

    Best case scenario for it will be to get a cohesive theme in that area where it is now, then buy a couple of new trains for it matching the new theme. 

     

    That does make more logical sense I do agree I think a change in theme will eventually happen it appears ardent is attempting to make the themed areas flow better  instead of random placement of attractions like in the past 

  8. I think SeaWorld needs a complete overhaul  they have removed most of the draw cards they had as far as theme park attractions go that made it interesting for thrill seekers  Bermuda corkscrew pirate ship cable car  ect I think they need to gut out the water park there's 2 very large water parks already in the area why bother really TBH  put in at least 2 or 3 new nautical themed  thrill flat rides and they need a decent coaster with inversions  possibly relocate a few other attractions to make space and the overall theme flow better in the park if they keep removing old attractions it will Just end up an aquarium and sea life  zoo park with a monorail and a random coaster lol 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.