Jump to content

Reanimated35

Members
  • Posts

    6,630
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    321

Posts posted by Reanimated35

  1. 26 minutes ago, Flynn_Smith said:

    Tower of Terror would get anything changed anytime soon, because there isn't really a need for it. It's fine how it is

    Except that it's currently broken. 

     

    SE recently had some love so that won't happen for a while. 

    SW has other priorities than refurbishment of an existing ride (JR) that's still relatively new in the grand scheme of things. 

    DW has a lot to work on, but my money is on the park being unrecognisable in 5-7 years anyway so I'm not holding my breath on it being much of a theme park going forward, so I can't see them bothering to do much with it unless ownership changes to a company who actually wants to run a theme park. 

    So that leaves VRTP to refurb maybe something at WnW since they haven't been in the news much lately, but do they really need anything? They're still popular. 

    MW could expand around the wild west area, but I wouldn't expect that for some years yet. 

  2. 1 hour ago, jcgoldcoast said:

     I've been around here a long time, so I'm very aware of what happened to the ride in the past. I wasn't questioning what happened, I was questioning why a smoke effect could just be ruled out.

    Then I'm sure you're aware that you're not the only person on the forums who might have questions about the history of the ride and at no point was the comment directed specifically at you. 

  3. 9 minutes ago, Theme Park Girl said:

    @jcgoldcoast after the fire incident in 2003 they don't want to take any chances, especially when one of the rumours for the cause of it was a faulty smoke machine. Alas I don't know if it was ever publicly confirmed what the cause was. But yeah, unfortunately due to that it means they are keeping the visual effects inside the mountaim down to a minimal. 

    And for anyone who wants to know more, please search the forums. It's been discussed many times in the past. 

  4. My opinion: when I finally decide to stop going on cruises and go back to the USA, I'm planning at least 4 days in Anaheim for DL/DCA and at least 2 days for SFMM, and even then I'd be concerned I wouldn't get through everything I wanted to see there and thoroughly enjoy. 

    100% buy the platinum fast pass thing for SFMM regardless of cost if you won't be back for a long time. 

  5. 2 hours ago, Brad2912 said:

    Won't post the whole article as it's yet another Dreamworld disaster rehash article (enough Already). 

    But an interesting comment from the family/spokeswoman for the Dorset Family

    Ms Brookfield said her friend’s fierce wish was for Dreamworld to be rebranded, to be a landmark and an attraction, without rides.

    “Kim has told me she would love the theme park to become a zoo, it would be a fitting tribute to those lost,” she said.

     

    Whilst I totally understand grief, it has clearly clouded her judgment of the financial implications of the suggestion.  In an early quote she said she knew livelihoods were at stake so didn't want the park to shut down. Those 2 ideas don't go hand in hand. Retro-fitting a theme park into a zoo, apart from basically being impossible, would require almost a complete levelling of the site and re-development, which would cost hundreds of millions of dollars

    I get that she probably wants the place shut down so she doesn't have bad memories etc, but how exactly is a zoo a "fitting tribute" those lost? 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.