Jump to content

dbo121

Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by dbo121

  1. 1 hour ago, Rabbit2014 said:

    I think vintage cars will be retired in current location until new vintage cars open in Rivertown.
    You can see tree took out part of roof of the load/unload and it wouldn’t surprise me if there was a ride vehicle that was under the wreckage.

    Speculation re ride vehicle but agree . One vehicle alone would not stop a reopening . They wont bother given other damage. 

    Sad ending to the historical cars . I have no nostalgia for the current track in its location . Only the cars and their sound as you accelerate . The track at new location could never compete with the old one, which moto coaster took over. I recall the characters that randomly appeared at times on it before the 2000s ( convicts / police and even Goldie the clown at times ) .  Created a good vibe . 
     

    One day a car broke down in the track . My father restarted it ( was like a motor mower ) as the younger operator struggled ) . Good memories. 

  2. 7 hours ago, Baconjack said:

    There's bigger fish to fry at the park. Dreamworld only have so much money in the budget, I'd rather that money go towards a renovation of Motocoaster rather than re-opening a ride that's got 6 months left at most before it gets moved.

    It’s being replaced with new version and not removed . 
    If it was a decision based on cash alone I don’t think they would bother either . Is it there last original attraction? I’m guessing they see it as being upgraded / replaced so that may play into it re the old version not coming back now . 

  3. 1 hour ago, Baconjack said:

    If that’s true then what is the point of making the effort to re open it then if it’s all going to get demo’d in a few months?

    Reckon we might see vintage cars closed until Rivertown opens

     

    Surely if they are true to attempting rebrand to nostalgia they will allow a last hurrah with these cars !

    Will never see them again in operation .

    just have to remove the damaged roof . 

  4. 32 minutes ago, red dragin said:

    Both water parks would have to get the water back within standards range as well. All that debris and rain water will have thrown the balance out. 

    Yeah .. I don’t think it’s the power . More likely that and filtering etc . Explains wnw at same time which they openly say 

  5. 8 hours ago, red dragin said:

    Could be damage to specific electrical infrastructure at White Water World.

    It could also draw from a different grid to Dreamworld. 

    I would think it’s on same grid external . Could be an internal issue but i wonder if it has something to do with getting all resources to focus on dreamworld safety testing but they just don’t want to say it ! . 

  6. 19 minutes ago, DaptoFunlandGuy said:

    Is that duct tape though? 

    What I can see are the pads attached to beams that are in proximity to the train, which are fastened on the back with fairly wide straps. That's what I can see here, not duct tape.

    Well if it quacks like a duck.. no it looks like a strap but it is not consistently elsewhere . Appears temporary  and should have been removed prior to opening .

    Time will tell if it disappears…

     

  7. On MW I sense the private equity owner will extract as much value as possible whilst minimising capex.

    This happened to DW when Macquarie leisure trust took ownership . A quick bang for buck and return on equity rather than a longer term vision where it became unstuck.

    This all runs in cycles and depends on how much they are generating over their perceived cost of capital ( which they can deploy back in ).  Of course they can borrow money but balance sheet positions post covid are not in the best shape . 

  8. 2 hours ago, Spotty said:

    May as well just keep Vortex closed until December now (if they are still building Leviathan) and open the pair of rides up for Xmas holidays together. Double whammy if you ask me. With the park fully closed to guests, it would be easier if you ask me to get a heap of construction done I guess. Here's hoping

    You said if . Not happening as planned I bet. At least not on original timeframe

  9. You are right about dcr but now paid out as per the vrl accounts. Yes there is one contract (purchase or lease) for track and another for construction . Should be able to source that info on ardent accounts. I’ll take a look . The track is saleable if purchased outright in current state and a discounted price probably .  Best case the construction will just be put on hold  to a later date. 

  10. 16 hours ago, MickeyD said:

    Yip I hear you @Brad2912. As someone who has been part of the Flight Centre Travel Group for the last 15 years, I don't need to tell you how south things have gone there these last couple of weeks. It's hard to keep positive in this shit show of a world we live in right now. Even Disney have reportedly suspended projects at this stage. Disney of all business!

    Oh and a little tip - might be worth checking your Superannuation. Just this week I had lost over 40k in a matter of a few days. If you have a super fund that has been heavily investing in the Stock market (like mine was) you might want to change it over to cash before you lose anymore! 

    I am most certainly not the only person out there who has copped this, just some friendly advice 😀

    Mate u need to see a financial advisor to get some advice on finance 101

    29 minutes ago, AlexB said:

    Not quite. Qantas executives are taking NO pay, not REDUCED pay.

    given the remuneration in the VRTP annual report I’m sure all the executives can afford to forgo their salary for the rest of the financial year.

    If you’re not retiring anytime soon, seek some advice before acting. If you ditch the stock strategy, the fund will ditch the stock, making a permanent loss.

    when stock prices go up, you won’t be holding them. If you retain the shares in the fund (by staying in a stock strategy), when they go up (and most of them will) your losses will reduce.

    best advice: before changing super strategies, seek financial advice from a professional advisor.

     

    What’s crappy here is the board only taking a 30 per cent cut at qantas .  Time for some people to take one for the team 

  11. 6 hours ago, Skeeta said:

    Because it took forever for Brogent Technologies to supply DW with the documentation WPHS required.  (DW said this a while ago).

    Thanks .. perhaps dreamworld outsourced these requirements to appease wphs to brogent ? It’s typical. ( ie transurban outsources development risks to contractors by seeking fixed price contracts  ) As a result of delay there may have been a financial compensation arrangement  perhaps. This may not of been under dreamworlds control.  

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.