Jump to content

sonic123488

Members
  • Posts

    416
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sonic123488

  1. I still think that $14 million USD is areasonable price tag, for what you get with a B&M sit down, but I still think that maybe something like the raging bull would be more appropriate with the Iron Man Theme.
  2. I would like one of our coasters to have something like this(I think it's a batwing?) http://www.rcdb.com/m/ig557.htm?picture=2 If I'm not right, the the piece of track you see of the silver bullet behind the sierra sidewinder is what I mean. Also the cost of something like this http://www.rcdb.com/m/id720.htm Seems realistic only $14 million US dollars.
  3. It would be great if that company got in to the coaster buisiness. We'd have a local manufactruer, but I can imagine the harness being a bell lowered over your head. But it would reduce the costs of coasters if the parks would buy them.
  4. Well the coaster behind Sierra Sidewinder is one I like. The "Silver Bullet". But I don't think Movieworld is ready for another Looping inverted. A top thrill Dragster clone would work at Dream world, but only if they downsized it to something like this http://www.rcdb.com/m/id3081.htm Back to Movie world, the raging bull looks like a great ride and would work well with the Iron Man theme. I was looking at Warner Village Corporate lately for a suggestion email address. Didn't have one. Looks like they're not interested in peoples suggestions.
  5. I like somethinglike the Hollywood Dream at Universal Japan if it were to be a hyper http://www.rcdb.com/m/id3621.htm Because it works well space wise... and it just looks great. Or something like this http://www.rcdb.com/m/id535.htm
  6. Who cares what the train looks like it's the ride that matters. If anyone has been on one of these coasters could I know what the ride is like.
  7. I don't know how good or bad the ride is but for ten millionUSD I like this one http://www.rcdb.com/m/id137.htm
  8. Well if we're talking B&M. I think a diving machine would be able to have its lifthill going over to the island, and the drop going in to the water and comin out the other side and having the ride do stuff over the lake.
  9. On the superman escape they push it don enough to be worried about the Netheregions.
  10. Exactly, this is(I Believe) the best option
  11. Oh and yes.. It think it would be best for Dreamworld if they open up a thrilling Inverted coaster Like this Bolliger and Mallibard, this would put Dreamworld back in the market for high thrills http://www.rcdb.com/m/id87.htm
  12. I also found this coaster with a neat price tage of about $10 million (US) Faster than the Superman Escape http://www.rcdb.com/m/id137.htm
  13. Spinball whizzer. But I'll warn you I haven't been on it and don't know what the ride is likehttp://www.rcdb.com/m/id2472.htmBut I've discovered a better option. For about 26 million dollars (CAD) check this outhttp://www.rcdb.com/m/id4005.htm
  14. Well coudn't the Australian parks order a custom one with a longer track.
  15. The Wonderland incedent I believe to be similar to thet of Expo Park. The Park was great but every but thought it's so close we don't have to rush there. This therefore ran expo down. But I fear this could start to happen at Luna Park Sydney.
  16. You're correct, Gazza has pestered me too. And made personal attacks critisising my posts. But lets put our Differences asside for a second here and get back to Roller Coasters. After all this is what the site is about. This is a similar coaster in speed and track layout to the Rock'n'rollercoaster http://www.rcdb.com/m/id769.htm It looks to me like it would work well space wise.
  17. Like this coaster at Disney World Florida The "Rock 'n' Roller Coaster" Linkage: http://www.rcdb.com/m/id560.htm
  18. Look I understand your point, and it doesn't seem that great to you. But for the time being I'm Thirteen and it still seems like a bit of a nostalgic adventure going there. People would say thet I'm lucky enough to live close enough to have an annual pass and be able to go all year to Dreamworld and Movieworld. But Luna Park is a change for me from all the high thrills of Movieworld and Dreamworld. I was just wondering why they don't put in any thing new to become big like their Gold Coast couterparts. If they didn't then why did they bother with the Big Dipper that was opened recently and taken down only to be taken to Dreamworld and called the Cyclone.
  19. Well, Luna Park Sydney is great and all but what's new? Will something big ever be built. Just wondering whether you guys have any Ideas on what happens next.
  20. Not enough stations, they need one near the Corkscrew.
  21. Sometimes, I agree that Cedar points doing well. talking about Cedar Point, I'd like to see something like the Maverick here in one of our parks.
  22. Unfortunately parks usually put in big rides if they're losing buisiness, I don't know whether MW is losing Buisiness.
  23. If they were to do a reno. they need to make the rooms bigger for the same cost. I mean, they need a bigger economy room, and that's a fact.
  24. Well they'll obviously show only the best rooms so to make it look good.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.