scott

Doesn't your camera record the sound?There was none when I played it.

Well,three dacedes is sure longer than I've been watching SW,let alone live.I think a water coaster is the key to the parks financial success.I'm not saying SW's broke,that's Wonderland,I mean that to introduce a couple more rides would mean a lot more rides after that.A water coaster like Journey To Atlantis still sticks to the sea theme but offers the thrills that SW really needs.

That's great footage Richard,geese it get's bloody close to being inverted.I especially like the Roller-Coaster.com sign towards the end.

can't you just give us a hint?Pleeeeaaaseee? I hope when you say 'cool stuff' you mean TOT being promoted to the highest coaster in the world again,but I'm doubting that.Re-theming would be good,but a change to the actual ride experience would be better.

Yeah,I know what you mean,but Seaworld in my opinion is sliding away from the theme park with good,thrilling rides that still maintains a strong focus on the enviroment and animals that it should be.well ok,you can't say what a theme park should and shouldn't be,but I really think SW should concentrate on this.The SW's in the US have more rides and attraction then ours;why shouldn't we?

bloody hell,I was just saying I think we have enough photos as it is. :mad:

bloody hell,I was just saying I think we have ebough photos as It is.

Your absolutely right,but I'm not sure I would place SW as last.But for me it's incredibly hard to choose the order,so maybe SW would go last.I remember leaving the park like a tight arse because Corkscrew didn't have an on-ride photo section.I really regret it seeing as my mum paid half the entrance fee.Then again,Corkscrew in my opinion is SW's top ride,and not having an on ride photo section there is bad.Sw's fastest ride(freefall slide,90kmh)isn't even generally classified as a ride,and that gives you some idea of how thrilling the rides at SW are.

Do we need anymore photos :confused:

Please,I'm interested in people's opinion,I hope I get some more people voting in the poll.

You've got a good point Maurice. My favourite game on n64 is definetly Goldeneye,as well as Super Smash Bros and Turok,Seeds of evil.

Okay,If Seaworld is to get a new ride,which it almost certainly will in the next few years,what do you think it will be,and what would you prefer?I only hope they don't introduce some crappy galaxy coaster-oops sorry,they've already had one of those.I'm hoping on a very well themed water coaster,something along the lines of Journey To Atlantis.A thrill ride(that is to say,not a coaster)wouldn't really suit SW,as they already have the two that would(pirate ship,log flume).

As,with Nebuchanezzar,I go with Nintendo 64.The controlers fit perfectly,there are no Memory Cards involved,and the graphics are better than ps1.The cheap bastards at Play Station make you pay for memory cards when on other consoles you don't need them.

I'm 12. It would great to go,but I doubt I can make it.A,I don't have an all-year pass,B,If these B&M rumours are true,I wanna stick around a while and spend my money at a DW with 2 new rides instead of one.I'll be there when the next one ride comes :)Plus I'm assuming the crowd's will be high for a while after the Claw.And that's my thingy below your name!

If Wet 'N' Wild were to get a thrill slide,which one would you prefer.(sorry,th ese are the only ones I know)

Can anybody who's been in winter tell me if it's worth it?I know it's heated,but is it still worth it.Of course,It's not as if the Gold Coast doesn't have a warm winter compared to other countries.

Who will be going on the opening date?By the way,just last night I saw DW's add for claw.It's a pretty good one,and showcases DW's rides' really well,but ironnically the introduction to the Claw was a bit stupid.

In year 7 and failing Maths.We have so much in common.

Really?I thought the train would have gathered enough speed to make it through the inversions.It would be much better if they made the first hill high enough to stop that having to happen;it would give a much smoother ride.

Jurrasic park theme could be good,DW could use the ones in TRR :)I'm not sure anymore;a flyer would be good,mainly because it would be new for Aus,and something I've never experienced before.(I wannna go to the States!)As I said,a standup would be good,but a flyer would be more compatible in the area.Well,it fits better in my opinion.Your ideas with the bridge(wich still allows Caturn Stuart to run)and the fog and jungle is great,but DW's area is naturally bush,that means alot of pulling shrubs out and different ones back in.Any other possible themes?

I was wondering,after the vertical loop,as the train climbs the second lift hill,does it really need the lift chain?I mean, doesn't the train have enough momentum to travel far enough up the hill to give enough speed on the descent to travel through the last 3 inversions.

200 kmh!?I seriously doubt it.Especially here in aus.Then again,we had the fastest coaster for a while,so you never know.

I wouldn't mind a B & M,but I'd prefer Dreamworld getting a standup rather than a flying.Also,having the coaster over the river will ruin the area,but then again the only other space DW has in the park at the moment is the Thunder Bolt site.

Yeah,I did,the ride is incredibly short for five dollars fifty.

My mistake.