sonic123488

They woudn't build a theme park with no space to expand, plus at Dreamworld if they got rid of the Big Brother stuff(Good Riddance!) There would Probabably be enough space, and at movie world between Wild West Falls and Lethal Weapon, I believe there was a forum competition for No limits which was to design a coaster for that space.

Why doesn't Australia have any thing like a mega coaster or a coaster with a really long track, there's nothing really majour here Why?

45 kilograms

Does the police academy stunt show really need to be replaced? It's still a great attraction and I don't think it needs to be replaced, even if you haven't seen the movies it's still great

On Monday the 8th of October, I had a trip to Dreamworld and thought I'd try the Mick Doohan Motocoaster. So I waited in the line for an hour to get on the ride. When I finally got on, I followed all directions for putting the harness on. But as soon as it launched the harness clicked in to place over my knees, those who have ridden it will understand what I mean, the harness cut off circulation to my calfs and feet I was screaming out in pain but everyone else probably thought I was screaming for the thrill of the ride. I ended up complaining but I don't think they'll take the complaint seriously, what do you guys think?

Good, it's about time Dreamworld built a new coaster

Well I've never had any probelems on the SE. I've been to Movie world 6 times when the SE's been there and I've never seen it break down

I'm more interested in riding that thing than looking at construction, it's Australias first half-pipe coaster! I know some people are interested in the construction of the coaster, but I wanna' enjoy the ride before talking about the construction technique.

sorry to brake it to you but I think that could be where the half pipe coaster 'll go.

When I went to movieworld I asked why superman and LW close in rain and they said it was because when rain drops hit your face at a fast speed it feels like a bee's stinging you.

I saw this story on seven news today, he hit the 'kid' (really a teenager) in the face!, and he was very hardly hit.

That's why they need a new coaster!

Finally people understand what I'm saying!!!

Well there's more than one ride up there, you can also go on the SDSC while you're up there in that part of movieworld. And don't forget about the lethal weapon!

I'm going to stick with a B&M flying coaster, cos' like a diving coaster it would still be an Australian first. And a diving coaster is nothing speacial when you think about it, it's a sit down coaster, track's below you. With a flying coaster though you open up a whole new category of coasters for Australia!

I reckon........ it's Australia's only (real) inverted coaster

I wish wonderland sydney could have stayed, showing pictures just brings up long lost sad memories of a park that was great.

Well the TOT actully it does go to 160kph, maybe I was wrong people make mistakes.

No, it doesn't have a barf burger it has...... well you can check it out http://www.whitewaterworld.com.au/content/...alsnMerchandise

I own it and it's fun as, but unfourtunately you can't just build a park you have missions that you have to complete. You can run around the park, heck you can even flirt!

I'm still going to stick with a tatsu like coaster.

It's pretty much exactly the same as the spinball whizzer in fact it is. Except it's indoors

Actully it wasn't superman the escape was the first one to break the 100 mph speed barrier. the tower of terror came after superman the escape have a look for yourself: http://www.sixflags.com/thrills.asp (look down the page)

Well what about adding more carparks in that area where they keep the ride pieces now, but not to much so as to leave space for a new ride.

You know I think dazzleland(I'm sure) was owned by whoever owned tops. Because the dragon at tops was a zamperla powered coaster. If you've seen the one at tops and want to compare click here: http://www.rcdb.com/ig2313.htm?picture=1 note: if you want to look at the dragon click here: http://www.rcdb.com/ig2383.htm