sonic123488

My favourite out of Gazza's pictures is Sheikra. A floorless vertical drop coaster is desperately thrilling, and with good theming could be great.

Here is a link with info http://www.adventura.com.au/Waterpark/index.html

Well I am glad that it is an Australian first (first Motorcycle coaster). And at least it is something new. But I'm still not happy with it.

I don't have any news, but was wondering if there was any follow up info on this?

I also wish I could have more allowance on my Broadband plan

I went to the pool area last year while staying, but the thing is doesn't seaworld already have a water park? I know it's as part of the Theme park, but if they wanted a mini waterpark, coudn't they just make that part of the resort?

I wish I had Foxtel

There was once an article on this topic, but I was wondering whether anybody has follow up info on the Water Park on the sunshine coast.

We've gone through the indoor discussion earlier, I don't get why we want another indoor coaster when we already have one. But this coaster has a similar layout to Rock'n'Rollercoaster, so you know what I luv superman wants to change http://www.rcdb.com/m/id769.htm

Well all I can hope is that it's something bigger (and a better ride expierience than the batwing). For Sea world another coaster please. And Wet'n'Wild I would enjoy something like this http://www.proslide.com/rides.php?mainRideID=5 Terror Canyon 3 anyone?

After looking at it more closer I like the idea of a euro fighter custom linkage http://rcdb.com/m/id2721.htm

Just a question about Tornado Alley, does that thing have two tornado elements at different levels, because that would have to take up a large space. This is what I'm talking about http://www.proslide.com/images/rides/1/4_design_2.pdf

I'm not sure where you're getting all the info for what sort of rides they'll be. Could someone give me a link that gets me straight there?

Well i'd like to think that this is true. As for wiping Dreamworld off, that's an opinion. But I would like to know exactly who the source was, because to it's still a rumor if we don't know what position they're in.

The First drop probably needs to be steeper than it is, but other than that it's great!

Well I think it's a Cyclone machine, and when you go on the coaster your on a machine riding through the cyclone.

Do you guys think Australia zoo should build a thrill ride or roller coaster like Busch Gardens Africa in Florida? When I say this it goes for every zoo in Australia, just animals or something more.......

that's a good idea, maybe they should tear down the tumble bug and build a replica of the old Big Dipper.

Well Gazza, that's why the twelve inversion coaster is perfect. Not the biggest or the fastest, but a nice long,and thrilling, ride.

But imagine the possibilities with a twelve inversion coaster, recerd breaking, possibly making up for the disapointment of Mick Doohan! They need to do something which gives a better ride than that, and atwelve inversion rollercoaster goes almost 100kph, putting Dreamworld right back up there with speed.

Well I know I'm changing my ideas again, but couldn't Dreamworld get a world record again? Look at the last coaster on the page, it does not yet exist off paper, but this might be the thing Dreamworld needs to win the inversion battle(not thet there ever was one). Partly because the cyclone is their only looping roller coaster, and this would bring some definite variety. http://www.intaminworldwide.com/iag/index....9&Itemid=32

Now I know it would seem like copying Movieworld, but an S&S powershot would fit in their nicely.

I still believe Dreamworld could have done better with this coaster.

Look I'm really sorry about the wording, it should say-Do you think the Mick Doohan Motocoaster was a Mistake? Personally, I didn't think it was worth the wait. It was all built up like a really good coaster but the ride time and length is just totally disapointing. The pain is horrible, I think we estblished that in this Topic http://www.parkz.com.au/forums/in...?showtopic=3625All in all I'd say this was a miserable attempt at a "big" ride.I also hope that the next ride they put in at Dreamworld is a better designed one. I think this would think would be a more appropriate addition: http://www.rcdb.com/m/id2536.htm

Well it seems to me from what I've seen people say about Mick Doohans Motocoaster, that nobody seems to enjoys it as much as they should be enjoying it. Has Dreamworld made their biggest mistake?