Jump to content

Ryande16

Members
  • Posts

    329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Ryande16

  1. @Slick i agree a euro fighter style coaster is such an underated coaster that is great value for money. However a coaster like takabisha is still an expensive ride (28.5 million us), but i think a euro fighter around 35-40 metres tall, around 800 metres long with 5 or 6 inversions could have been a great addition to Dream world instead of spending 10 million on MDMC and 7 million on Buzzsaw. 

     

  2. My list of best coasters in Australia 

    1. DC rivals

    2. Superman

    3. Abyss

    4. TOT 

    5. Arkman asylum 

    6. Green lantern 

    7. HWSW

    8. Jet rescue

    9. Scooby doo

    10. Buzzsaw

    11. MDMC

    12. Looney tunes

    13. Nickelodeon one

    4 out of top 6 are from MW

    Dreamworld need something big soon.

    Not taking away anything away from dreamworld as i truly love the park, but i feel they would have been far better off adding in a big attraction every 5-10 years then a small one every couple years.

     

     

  3. 7 hours ago, themagician said:

    MWs FB post alone has gotten 1.1 million views so far.

    With now over 1.3 million views and 70 thousand comments of people tagging friends saying how excited they are, i think MW would be more then pleased with the exposure and response it has gotten on the first day.

  4. I think 3 minutes is a bit of an exaggeration because flash's total ride time is 2 minutes and i doubt it takes an extra minute to do 100 meters. So just say its 2:15 from start to finnish that would get through about 590pph.

    And plus they did say that it's the most technologically advanced ride ever to be built so they probably have something up there sleeve. 

  5. 1 minute ago, AlexB said:

    I was thinking that, but then can't imagine the queue would be much more than the typical 'i'm waiting for the front seat' mentality - i do think in the first few months it will be mental.

    Personally, since we know there is at least (most likely precisely) two trains, i'd like to have seen them do one train all forward two backward, and the second train all backward, two forward...

    That's a stupid idea tbh most people would be to scared going backwards.

    2 minutes ago, mission said:

    Yeah two backwards doesn't seem to be enough to what will likely be high demand, at least four I would have thought.

     

    But anyway, there's probably technical reasons for that - two's better than zero!

    4 would have been perfect 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.