Jump to content

Mc coaster

Members
  • Posts

    305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Mc coaster

  1. Contrast to that i was at wet n wild GC today and it was packed I waited 1hr and 35mins for tornado and 40mins for surfrider for the rest of the day I just hung around in the wave pool which was also super crowded and the lazy river. They really do need to add new slides to help with capacity especially after the closure of Mach5 I do not think it is hard they have so many options like a water coaster or a bowl and they aren’t that expensive compared to dry park rides.

    • Like 1
  2. I think what they did was either remove or cover up remenats of the Chinese style buildings. When I was there last April I noticed that the roof had the original roof designs and there were quite a few patterns on the sides of the buildings left over from Chinatown alley just painted over in gray it was not super noticeable but me and my friend did see it. If this work is to remove it I am really impressed because it is not something that they really have to do and it wil make that area look just that much better.

  3. 16 minutes ago, Evie said:

    Well King Julian’s Theatre isn’t all that big and is in the Dreamworks precinct so most likely can only be used for anything Dreamworks/ Madagascar licensed.

    And what other usable stages to they have?

    Umm I think you are forgetting about the massive unused Big Brother Amphitheatre.

    • Like 4
  4. Hi guys I am going to Shanghai Disneyland next week was just wondering if there were any photo requests or anything you would like me to try to find out. If you could just let me know and I will write a list down since I do not think I will have access to the internet over there.

  5. 19 hours ago, pushbutton said:

    I'd say both physical sets and technology should be used to complement each other. A ride with only one or the other is probably unlikely to be very good.

    The thing is I think rides if done correctly can be amazing if they use both screens and physical sets. I think it becomes a problem when they decide to only use screens and no physical effects they look cheap, they do not feel as immersive and sometimes feel like you are just watching a movie. But I think on the other hand a ride with just physical sets are amazing yes sometimes they could do with a screen or two to liven it up but nothing can compare to seeing something 3D in front of think of the Navi river journey when you get off what do remember more the screens with the animals on them or that amazing shamen animatronic at the end. 

  6. It’s great that they are finally utilising the show stage for times other than fright nights. Hopefully they will constantly add and change out the exhibits to different upcoming movies. It is also great because when fright nights come back around they could easily close it for a couple weeks set up the maze and when they are done just put in a different exhibit.

  7. 2 hours ago, AlexB said:

    That'd be a 'spire'.

    Thought so but I wasn’t very sure. Thanks @AlexB

     

    8 minutes ago, Skeeta said:

    They need to do something because the tree did hide a very unattractive wall.

     

    Hopefully they do do something with it especially they since they have put in so much time and effort in rejuvenating the facade it would be such a shame if they just left it that way even if it is just putting in a new tree.

  8. Definitely think it was a bad idea to remove the tree I do not really now how to describe it but to me it kind of helped give it the spooky, forestry, scheduled feel to the front facade while now it looks very exposed and open which to me is not what they should be going for in a spooky castle. The detailing on the facades bricks look great but I think the brown cone things on top (not sure what they are called) stand out a bit to much and need to be darkened down a bit. I think overall it looks great and can’t wait to see what’s in store on the inside.

  9. 18 hours ago, pin142 said:

    Steel supports with wood track apparently still make for a wooden coaster.

     

    1 hour ago, Jamberoo Fan said:

    I'm pretty sure that the definition of a 'wooden coaster' is that it just has to have a mostly wooden track at a minimum.

    I think @pin142you are referring to RMC hybrid coasters which are built with their ibox track, these rides are nither classified as wood or steel coasters, they are built with a wooden supports and steel track. With this track they have been able to make amazing roller coaster such as my favourite roller coaster and only RMC I have ridden twisted colossus another noticeable one being steel vengeance. If we got one of these it would be amazing as they are amazing ride with strong layouts and cool elements.

    RMC also have a different type of track that from memory is called a topper track @Jamberoo Fan which is made of wood and is capable of doing different elements that the hybrids can do. This track enables wooden rollecoasters to be able to do things that have never been done before an example of this type of track is Outlaw run at silver dollar city or wildfire at Kolmården Wildlife Park. These rides are still classified as wooden roller coasters even though they may contain a little bit of steel.

    All of RMC rides are silky smooth great intense rides, with cool elements and loads of both ejected and floater airtime I hope we do see one of these in Australia and I think it would be a very good addition to SeaWorld because no doubt it would be the amazing kick butt roller coaster they need. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.