Leaderboard

I figure what is without a doubt the most cynical method of crowd control implemented at our parks in recent years deserves its own topic...

Regardless of cross compatibility issues, it isn't hard for them to build a website for cross-compatibility. Why do web designers insist on including all the latest gadgets that only work on the latest browsers (and then only some of them) just because they are there? Whatever happened to Netscape? Let's go back to Netscape 3.0 and be done with it! End of the day - what is the point of having a website if you're going to exclude a vast majority of users by not having it compatible across the board? I've seen many websites where you're given the option of 'flash site' or 'no flash' - at least give people the option of a more bare bones but still functional site - the content was already there - it is just a matter of how it is displayed.