DaptoFunlandGuy

i'm sure many people would be unaware that the restaurant even had a function room. I know it was in some earlier concepts somewhere but I never saw it, nor any doorways leading to it, so when I saw the advertisement posted (which also said "live inside janes rivertown restaurant" it was a fair assumption for me to make it would take over the entire dining room. I've no doubt many other potential guests will see that and assume the same thing - potentially scaring diners away rather than attracting trivia buffs! I realise it's their marketing and not yours brad - not aiming my critique at you, just calling it how I see it. Also as an additional critique of the park - the early days of opening, they had queues, and refused people a table on the basis that they were waiting for tables - but they had an entire function room space they could have opened up to seat more covers?

Well now - be sure to read things properly to understand what's happening before looking silly - you're incorrect here for two reasons a ride envelope with a supervising operator is a bit different to a static display with no staff on duty in any nearby capacity I was answering the question posed by Narra about what risks they did identify, and I was postulating what logic MW's consultancy firm may have used - rather than stating my own opinion.

You can't rush these things. it might take other folk 9 months to build a rollercoaster, but here at village, we'll refurbish one in 3 years if it kills us.

Yeah look - I'm glad they're trying things out and it's awesome you've been able to collaborate with them. I know they want to drive visitation and increase revenue, and i'm not shitting on the concept at all - I don't mind a little pub trivia on occasion while having a drink or two... ...but if trivia is happening in a venue - I prefer to eat elsewhere. This is definitely something i'd avoid, for my own personal tastes and preferences.

Also probably down to it being a kids ride in a kids area, and assuming children would follow instructions and adults would be mature enough to take responsibility for their own actions (and their progeny).

Seriously? that shit has bothered me for years and they fix it NOW?

100% was not suggesting your prior callouts were undeserved - though in some cases I would hold a different opinion!

sensible decision.

Kudos for the self-reflection and calling out your prior criticisms in comparison - I agree with you though - the whole area is beautifully done and almost perfect. The progress they've made from "opening" day to now is wonderful and the turntable chamber would have easily dragged the score lower if you'd seen it on opening day when it was practically a black box. It would have been great for them to open fully show-ready, but they easily could have opened and called it a day - so the constant installations and upgrades post-opening where they continue to plus it really does deserve that 9/10 - and maybe when they're finished - maybe it'll even crack that double digits... it is definitely really well done. Just unfortunate the timing of things (which they definitely should have allowed for in the project, so there's really no excuse for the delays - but at least they're persisting!)

I'm wondering if someone could get crazy enough to create a zacspin style track for a zipper - so rather than just the loop it could do more? probably not practical for a traveller but that thing would look insane - i'm just spitballing what they could do to the humble zipper to reinvent it?

I've seen the same thing at many parks that open midweek in the off season. He frequently doesn't. The point about the attendance is that it increased on the prior year - by more than the amount you saw in the park no less. I'm quite sure someone said recently 'a water park is not a theme park'. It makes less sense to open it in winter. you're competing with a small enough crowd as it is. Dry park on the other hand, if you're open, you're forcing customers to choose between you and a competitor. If you close, you're giving the game away. As for the insurance payout, i'm sure it was absorbed into the capex for rivertown, so in a way, they did rebuild it - just elsewhere. (and even if it didn't technically get absorbed into the rivertown budget, it's all CE's money so it really doesn't matter. they got paid by insurance to rebuild vintage cars, and they rebuild vintage cars. end of. First of all, they're not sacked. Let's not start using emotive and inflammatory language to get people upset about a normal thing that happens every year. They're hired on contracts and the contracts have a fixed end date. As I understand it Raging Waters in Sydney has a similar issue with retaining staff over seasons, but its just the nature of a seasonal business and the workers go into that eyes open. I think more than a few waterpark folk double as Ski Resort workers in the winter, and many come back year on year. But that isn't a good enough reason to open the waterpark in winter. It is however a good enough reason to keep your dry park open.

plural? so either fully 4 is losing weight or triple vortex is going?

So, just to be clear, the person who was crying the park closed an hour early... is now suggesting the park should close in the off season instead? Just for the record - the 2024 annual report indicated attendance had increased by 14.3% from 2023 to 2024. On average, that's an extra 478 people in the park each day*. I am willing to bet that the opening of rivertown will have boosted this number again. Are there likely to be some days with low attendance that eat into profits? Yes. Does it make sense to shutter the dry park entirely in cold months? Not at all - events like winterfest are a hit and people are willing to visit a dry park in colder months - in fact the lower attendances make it a nicer visit for folk who prefer lesser crowds. Additionally the park being open midweek opens the opportunity to have school or tour groups drop by. International tourism is still increasing in the sector so offering a wildlife product to compete with Paradise country is also a source of additional profit. If they close the park entirely due to low visitation on some days, they give up the opportunity to turn a profit or welcome tour and school groups which supplement the park income. They also decimate their full-time employees who are no longer able to fulfil their contracted hours - which then leads to staff shortages in peak seasons and 3 hour waits for a hypercoaster.Nevermind wrong park. Does it make sense to shutter a water park in colder months? Yes it does. You're unlikely to make a profit, especially if you're competing with another one down the road. period. *Yes the group reports attendance across all properties including Skypoint so this isn't precisely indicative of park attendance. I'd like to say 'you get the point though' but I suspect you'll ignore it.

A reduction to zero is still a reduction. Yes, one stays open over winter, the other doesn't. See, a different perspective on this is the locals who have been many times who drop in for an afternoon after school, get a couple of rides, stay for the night market on those days. By putting the new thing in the morning, and having it stop before school lets out, those afternoon visitors HAVE to attend the park in the morning, when the kids are typically in school - so that ends up being a weekend visit for the school kids, and well, we're already here dad, can we go on other rides too... etc etc. Dreamworld doesn't want to put their hand in your pocket for a measly cent - they're going after the families having to make a special trip and likely to spend the day once they've been. Its the different demographic of the park though - Universal Hollywood guests are not typically dropping in for a single show and leaving, whereas most folk stopping into dreamworld are likely to spend at least a few hours (and a few dollars) while they're there, so bringing them in at a time they otherwise wouldn't have increases spend for normal people. I still say you'd get more money with a second eatery. No brain no pain. But it's also acclimatisation. I grew up in an area that regularly got temperatures below freezing. top temperatures rarely went above early 30s except a few days in the peak of summer nosing up to 40. When I first moved to QLD, I visited WNW in the winter, and everything was a nice walk-on. the wave pool was a bit chilly but everything else - because we didn't stand still in a queue - was pretty warm (I do miss the whirlpool springs being heated though). Almost two decades on, i've acclimatised. You won't catch me in a pool post-easter. For parks that we well know rely on the locals to support them in the off-season, expecting a bunch of folk acclimatised to a south east queensland climate to go swimming in winter is a bit absurd. The only feasible way to make it appealing is to build a dome over the park like they do in countries with cold climates so it becomes a greenhouse oasis. Unfortunately that means in Summer it becomes an Oven. And truthfully, I don't think anyone could agree that an all-weather dome over a park that big would be a practical and sensible expenditure. A winter attendance of 3-400 in a waterpark dropping due to rain = practically zero guests. A winter attendance of 3-4000 in a theme park dropping due to rain = still hundreds of guests.

Yeah if they've got a risk assessment that says that number is needed, i'm not going against it. I've seen the lifeguards and the aquatic trainers, and the constant view scanning they do, the frequent fatigue changeovers... much like the requirements in Australia for seatbelts and supplementary restraints on rides, i'd prefer overstaffed lifeguards than dead kids.