New display name

That is not the business of the mods or yours and what happens on another site. If you don't like it go to that site and complain.

@reanimated35 No need to ask AlexB. It looks shit.

No, Sorry I should have been more clear. The 2 things I wrote have nothing to do with each other. I showed the first one because it is wrong.

No, Quite the opposite. I do think if DW didn't already have something in place. The ship has sailed.

http://www.bo.de/nachrichten/nachrichten/die-adrenalin-fabrik

Whoever put this up has no idea. Mack Rides wrote an article in a German paper not long ago. Lucky for you I can read German. To sum it if you want to place an order with Mack, you will be placed onto a 2 ½ year waiting list.

AAAAAHHHHH GeForce is not the coaster I think is going into MW and it never was. I picked the easiest coaster off Richard’s list to trace and scale. It was just an example of a top 10 ride fitting in the area. I know what MW is building. PD Online isn’t my only source for information.

So are you saying Expedition GeForce is on the small side compared to what MW is getting? Or are you saying my picture looks small? I can't read between the lines ?

As I said @Wyncenuros The drawing is to scale of an existing TopGolf and building footprint. It measures 245.00

I scaled a TopGolf onto the MW site. With what is left do we have enough area for this coaster or is TopGolf going somewhere else?. Already answered my own question. I traced Expedition GeForce and stuck it on my site.

I have overlayed a drawing onto a map and got the locations of the tunnel and where it breaks through to the current MW carpark. The tunnel is 100m long if it stays underground while passing the substation. At this point of the tunnel you may find your hair standing up. From the new carpark exit point to the front gate at MW you are looking at a 395m walk.

It's not the first time @Richard has mentioned a hypercoaster. I thought when hypercoaster was being talked about that a MCU approval would be required. After doing a bit I research I found that MW have no height limits for rides. The building height at MW is 27m.

This shed was originally built for the company to build rockets in from what I have been told. For some reason they now build the rockets at Yatala. For time being they will be running a smaller tourist attraction within this shed until they start building the rockets in it as originally planned. The Strawberry Farm is where the final tourist attraction will be built and they purchased that land years ago. They also have the approval to build the tourist attraction on the old Strawberry Farm site. I believe this is why this is just a temporary attraction until the other one gets built. For now, you need to go with your school to get inside but it will open up to everybody once the one at the Strawberry Farm is completed. Some photos attached of what you can do and see inside.

This approval is just for a temporary approval for the use of the current shed. The main attraction is being built across the road. The first stage is not for the general public. It is for school kids.

MW has a new application in for “Eco Tents”. We all know what this is for but my question is - What is an Eco Tent? How is an Eco Tent different to an ordinary tent?

Yes that's what I took it for. My thought was more just a thought because I was looking at buying one for work. I was not thinking of flying one over MW myself.

I ran into a problem in buying one for work. You have to get a CASA certificate if you make money out of it.

I've been doing research to buy one for work. I wonder what the law is in relationship to how high you have to go before it’s not MW land.

Height of trees along residential boundaries. The proposed development incorporates detailed landscaping to protect and enhance visual amenity outcomes, including a minimum five (5) metre vegetated buffer where the parking station adjoins sensitive land uses Application conditions guests and staff will utilise existing pedestrian infrastructure to walk between the parking station and the adjoining Village Roadshow Theme Parks. (from application) Plan also shows future culvert to be built in another stage. Culverts are built for stormwater but can be for a pedestrian link This is not MW culvert.

I guess it depends which Doomsday they are going for. Anyone think they will do Doomsday and Superman battle in the street? I know who wins that battle.

1. Is it a spear? 2. Is it just a device to check clearances? 3. Why no connection points to secure the thingy? 4. Do you think all the theming attached to the ride are being built by an Australian company? I will answer my own questions. 1. Yes 2. No 3. Ride is a stock version 4. Yes

Plus, only a couple of dummies got to have a ride. After giving it much more thought I now believe the spear was installed to test it. What they were testing on the spear or ride, I do not know.

Anybody else thinking they are having issues to get it balanced?

You would think Disney would have got it right from the start.

The natural properties of the soil in a swamp would make it easier to contain the water. You just can't dig a hole in the ground anywhere and hope it will hold water. If the soil can't hold water then you would have to remove the soil and replace it with soil that will. I think it’s also the lowest point of MW. Once you make the swamp deeper I would think it would be able to handle more water and MW might be using it to reduce the flooding under the GL.