New display name

It's alright AlexB I don't want to be forgiven. Disney comes to Australia and says it can't make money on a park here but somehow a person who probably sold ice-cream for 9 years, tells us from his school kid drawings a company is giving him 1 billion dollars.

Yea you keep telling yourself that. Has Urban Estate Developments Pty Ltd ever developed anything in its life? You know there’s a company called Urban Developments PTY LTD. Did you just add to their name?

I'm Justin Bieber, Good to meet you. Jokes aside we get people coming to this site all the time claiming they have the best next thing about to happen and it never happens. If you owned the land to build this on then you might sound more convincing. Why it is that village can decide they are going to put a new water park in Sydney and do it relatively quickly. If village can do it and you say you have the funds, then why not stop talking about it and build the thing?

I don't believe the land is owned by village but when I came across the new hotel approval, it rang baby bells in my head. I remembered around 5 years ago a hotel was approved for the site I have shown. I don’t for a minute believe this is what MW have planned but thought someone might be interested in seeing it.

This is getting out of control now. Question - What is this carpark used for? It's located next WNW and who owns it?

At midnight I've been told.

Good thought. Richard is there a way for me acknowledge what has been said without having to write something like Good Job? I know I can like something but as per my current example, Brad can’t see that it was me acknowledging his response. I have nothing really to add to Brad's post but I want him know I read what he posted and maybe even agreed with it.

Something I just picked up on. Stage 2 are units where stage 1 are cabins & tent sites. Does anyone else think that MW are building the first stage as a test before committing large amounts of money to this project?

That's for self assessable but you could go closer if you did it under impact assessable. I've gave up on my idea once the plans came out for the earthworks.

What I know – Roller Coaster – Approved for construction. OPW (Earthworks) - = new accommodation area. More approvals to be lodged for this one. New Attraction & Lakeside Precinct- Stage 1 Early works. Approved for construction. (Things to note about this one.) This is an approval so some minor construction can start. More approvals to be lodged for this one. No lake can be seen within the new accommodation area and it’s located on the side of a hill. Entertainment Precinct- Stage 1 Early works. Approved for construction. This is an approval so some minor construction can start. More approvals to be lodged for this one. There is to much more information to get lodged on all of this and that I’m taking the 6th till I see more. Special mention is everything is approved except for the OPW

Not saying anyone in particular and I have done it myself but if you put in some effort to post something it would be good if we all put in the effort to read other people's post first.

Looking the plans I'm thinking we could both be right. The top cabins are your name and the lower cabins are my name maybe.

I really wish people would start reading other people post before writing their own post. It is so annoying reading the same post over and over. Another thing is if people are going to jump on PD online it often helps to read the whole document before posting about it. There is a method to my madness to why I say only people like Brad, Alex & some others should be pulling information of these documents. Town planning and certification takes years & years of schooling just to understand these documents so it makes sense to me, only people with more than half a brain should be trying to write about them. PSSS Brad you forgot to mention that the cabins are not part of Paradise Country Cabins but is called Outback Spectacular Lodge.

Ok stop right there. Skeet has now been show to be 100% wrong. Earthworks has nothing to do with new roller coaster. I am going to be out on site most of the day and I need a computer to open the files up correctly. I'm looking at people like Alex, Brad and Richard to to go to skeeta's source and reveal the great findings. Richind get your keyboard oiled up I feel another story coming on.

In short DW is saying they have nothing major being built in 2016. If they had a major new ride then they would have something in place by now. It's not like a Bunnings and you can purchase this stuff of the shelf. If you look at the question being asked it goes something like this. Hi DW,. MW are getting something kickass next year. Are you getting something kickass too? DW because they have nothing planned but don't won't you to buy a pass to MV come back with the only thing they could say. DW could not promise anything because they have no kickass coming so they danced around the question.

Don't thank me yet, I don't think anything I have said has ever come about. Man I am screwing my post up today but this one is for Alex. I haven't solved the staff entrance problem yet but I am working on it The thing that makes me think MW has already solved this problem is the 3 applications where lodged on the same day. One of the applications was for admin buildings.

Yes as in your case being residential it is hard to get a easement moved off your property because it is normally running through a lot of other people's land and if you had the money to move what ever was causing the easement for you then you would have to move it off everyone's land to divert it around your land. Being that if it is a stormwater easement it looks like it is at the end of the easement which would make it easier to relocate. The other thing that makes skeet think what ever they are doing with the earthworks is major is the company that has lodge the application. For your easment you may want to look up the QDC for the rules on easements. The QDC took this off councils this year and I believe under the QDC you can now build up to your easement. Getting back to MW easement you will find commercial buildings encroach easements a lot. If you think of Brisbane city and all of the services that would run under the buildings, I think you might understand what I am trying to spit out. Im not saying it is getting built in that area it is just my thoughts 101 on where it could go. Another thing to add is the entrance already goes over the easement. Last thing to add (gosh I'm a dick) is if for some reason is MV where not allowed to build over it then it could be used as a street along that line through the new area. sorry this post was for Brad, you would think after all these years I could quote

Given it leads to a sub station it could be power into MV. One thing I forgot to mention is I can't find my storm water plans so it might be storm water. No the council does not lease that land to MV. This image is from the G.C.C.C. website. At some stage Village must have gone to the titles office and got all the different properties amalgamated onto one title. I don’t have the time to look it up but you can do a search for older titles that might show it was once council land but I don’t know if it ever was.

I did not draw on the plan. The green area is an overlay from The Department of Natural Resources and Mines. The info tab on it telsl me it is an easement but I do not know what is in the easement. I will pull up some records to see what is under the ground there. Table Red = Boundaries Blue = Water Green = Sewer Yellow = Roads So by my drawings it only leaves one thing it could be which is power.

That land is all owned by Movie World. The blue arrow pointing to the yellow line indicates the boundary line. The red arrow pointing to the green area is an easement. The easement is on MW property. The boundary lines shown, I have taken form The Department of Natural Resources and Mines.

Skeetafly theory 101. Existing overflow carpark changed to a permanent carpark. (Makes sense to be relating to the area size that I have been talking about). Movie World extending out somewhere near where push indicated. (This is logical to me because this area has a water source to create a lake) I just want to state 99.9% of the time I am wrong and if you ask my wife it’s more like 100%.

Yea Dw has dabbled in the same thing also but it never went anywhere.

I do not know but Brad is right, I think it was killed off a long time ago. Also if something was going outside of the park, I would of thought we would see a MCU application for it. Just to add to my earlier info I found. The prices MW paid for the OPW would indicate that. Earthworks size = 1001m2 to 5000m2 The tree removal is linked to another application. (what that application is, I do not know) "Tree works linked to a development application, includes vegetation management plan and fauna management plan when the MCU/ROL requires these plans to be submitted in conjunction with Tree Works application."

I'm starting to get a bit revved up. I might need to go and have a smoke to calm down and the strange thing I don’t even smoke.

Interesting indeed. We did roughly work out that the OPW application cost of work was a lot. My investigations so far makes me think the large cost of works for ground level changes could be for a new lake. To me the new attraction early works would be for the roller coaster. The entertainment precinct could be a whole new themed area. More digging to be done lol. I do also remember somewhere at some time and correct me if I am wrong but MV where looking at doing a different precinct to the park,. something like at the front of disney that never ended up happening. Just read the approvals again and it's not 1 but 2 new precincts. To break it down what we know. 1. New Roller Coaster 2. Lots of earthworks 3. New attraction which might be talking about new roller coaster or could be an extra attraction. 4. New entertainment precinct. 5. New lake precinct. 6. Carpark changes 7. Amenity building changes or new buildings.