Leaderboard
.thumb.jpeg.eb47109a7befe09821c7d8c9e1565e4c.jpeg)
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 29/08/23 in all areas
-
I’d glad they’re not focusing on IP Mazes, while some of my favourite ever mazes at the event are IP based, in more recent years I’ve thought the non-IP mazes have been better. I still think having 2 IP mazes is a must (which is what we’ve got this year), but having 3 in house mazes is great and should mean we get overall better mazes because there’s extra funds.2 points
-
All of this feels a bit pathetic. Maybe because it’s not for me and not something I would ever use or want to try out, but I can’t see this lasting. All of these subscriptions/extras they now have seems like wasted resources when they could be putting these efforts into the product they have (the parks themselves). But if anyone thinks this is worth while and they see good opportunities, I’d like to hear your thoughts1 point
-
From what i've heard, they've pulled back a bit from relying heavily on an existing IP and are instead pushing the funds they'd normally spend on licencing on fleshing out the mazes a bit more. It's a bold strategy Cotton.1 point
-
Both of those look great!! Very promising! Love that DW is going down the themed route - hopefully learning from the trend at other parks worldwide1 point
This leaderboard is set to Brisbane/GMT+10:00