Dreamworld vs Pico Play court case

[rappa]

I think it’s foolish in such projects to assume or decide that issues are the fault/blame of one party. That’s simply not the reality of how things happen. 

[TV15]

For anyone wanting the actual/more indepth details of the case it can be found here: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qsc/2025/227

Edited Friday at 11:36 PM by TV15

[DaptoFunlandGuy]

On 25/10/2025 at 9:36 AM, TV15 said:

For anyone wanting the actual/more indepth details of the case it can be found here: https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qsc/2025/227

Objection your honour, this question has been asked and answered.  

On 22/10/2025 at 1:46 PM, DaptoFunlandGuy said:

The supreme court judgment has some interesting details...

Pico Play Pty Ltd v Coast Entertainment Operations Limited [2025] QSC 227 (9 September 2025)

• Pico Play's total budget for the theming works of Rivertown was $5,000,000
• The contract stipulated a total fee of $4,148,550 (ex GST)
• The GRC panels (i assume the themed cladding for the inside, outside and queue areas of the 'temple') were $1,561,794 (package 1a)
• The show elements for jungle rush - external, queue scenes and ride scenes - were $1,008,091 (package 1b)
• Murrissippi Motors was $1,002,339 (package 2)
• 'Area Development' was $576,326 (package 3)

As an aside - it seems they had no involvement in Jane's restaurant which explains why the internal theme wasn't perhaps to the same standards as the rest of the land