DaptoFunlandGuy

If they're utilising the Showtime FMX guys, it won't last anywhere near 6 months. They have standing gigs with every major 'town show' in the country - from the Sydney RES to the Ekka and everything in between. No - if Showtime are involved, this is strictly a summer holiday thing and will be gone by February.

I think at this stage it may actually help them. By this stage in the game, they'd have to be done with most of the attractions - or at least the footings etc. They'd be turning to fit-out and polishing, landscaping and painting by now I would presume - most of that sort of thing can be done in the wet, and in particular - landscaping is a little easier with some dampened soil, as opposed to dried out cracked clay...

if the show was so terrible, it wouldn't rate so well and the networks would axe it. bottom line is if the house burnt down, Dreamworld would lose some capacity and revenue over summer by not being able to promote the house as a venue and an attraction, but at the end of the day, if 2014 will see another season, they have to rebuild it anyway. Channel 10 would totally revamp the house every year, whereas this year's house was very similar to last year's house, with many mostly cosmetic changes. They'd lose some equipment, and take a hit on their insurance, but the house would have been gutted and rebuilt for next year anyway.

As has been said - don't write off the golden arches. Family take-away stores don't get a favourable look-in as they can be 'friend of a friend' type references and are unreliable - but if you can last a year with the big red clown, it shows you've got commitment and determination to the task (or you really need to eat while studying at uni). I was lucky not to work at McD's, but I found my resume in early life was devoid of certain skills that employers wanted to see later. I had them, but I couldn't demonstrate them unless I got called for interview. As (i think it was) Brad said - the Maccas guys went to the top of the pile. My first five forays into the world of employment were (in order): Newspaper delivery (great exercise but lousy pay) Video Store (lasted a week but couldn't work the hours required) Bunnings (first store in NSW, with long hours and well away from public transport, but rewarding experience) IT support in local government (first office exposure) Wonderland Sydney (to this day, probably one of the best jobs I ever had). I will say my personality had a lot to do with my getting into Wonderland, but my customer interaction skills were fine-tuned by my work at Bunnings, and is what got me the interview in the first place.

No, it was about the same size it is now.

Sea World is going to get themselves in trouble with the GCCC - the third picture of the fencing shows a panel tipped sideways to block what appears to be a gateway - thereby turning the panel into a ladder to climb over the fence and into the 'pool'. I hope they have gotten their 'pool safety certificate' already - otherwise that won't pass inspection!!! Aside: yes, i know it isn't a pool. yes I know the panel is temporary, and i'm assuming will be replaced with a proper gate once it arrives. I'm just taking the piss, no need for flaming.

I personally think the drop freefall tower is a great idea. Perfectly suited to capitalise on the views of the harbour. If they get one not too high, it shouldn't impact on the residents in that area as the cliffs are still pretty high at that point, not to mention the parking structure backs most of it behind there...

It would be great if they can integrate this into the existing show a bit (they use bikes already, after all) without having to take up too much space on the skid pan with cumbersome landing ramps and such. I get that they need that kind of thing to be very specific for takeoff and landing, but the trailer and truck are fine in the middle of a showground during cracker night - they are ill suited to 'little italy' in HSD.

I did try to warn you on the 'umm' situation. Good on you for getting a new shirt, and practising some questions beforehand. I must admit, i'm with Brad - those questions (or that type of question) is pretty standard for a customer service position - they're so basic I don't use them anymore when i'm involved in recruitment. That said - it's pretty clear that this was your first interview, and nobody could have prepared you for every possible question you'd get your first time. Interviews are as much about experience as they are about getting the job. You say 'next year', but why not 'next week' ? Apply for jobs elsewhere. If you're entering the workforce for the first time you aren't going to land that glamorous job you've always wanted on your first attempt - go out, work hard and get dirty. Despite never working there myself, I've always had a lot of respect for Maccas staff who lasted a year or more... Most places hiring juniors aren't interested in experience - thats where you get it - so make enquiries at those 'youth employment' employers like McD's (and other fast food)... but don't go past other big-box places like Bunnings. If this kind of work is beneath you, then you will probably be unemployed for a while... but if you can get into a job that isn't glamorous, exposes you to customers (and customer service) then the next time someone asks you what a customer would expect from you when they complained, you'll know the answer because you'll probably have dealt with it previously. Above all though, as a few have stated to you already - you need to exude confidence as best as you can. At that target age group, they know they're going to get a few nervous people that fluff the interview (and if you haven't had a rejection from them yet, i wouldn't write your interview off just yet... you never know what they might have seen in you), but those who come across as confident (not cocky) are more likely to impress them.

Ah, but when calm, the water is equalised. When waves are in operation, it doesn't go from a 1m calm height to 3 metres high. Theory of relativity - every action has an equal and opposite reaction - so it is possible that the ebb could go as low as 1 foot, and as high as 6 foot(ish), which means you aren't far off the "2 metre" mark. Yes the figures aren't quite right, but you get the idea. *Where 'D' is still water height, and (as Bussy said) the 'height' of the wave is measured at 'H'

Jordan, it has all the hallmarks, but something's 'not quite right' for me. Bussy would be the better person to question... the S and the P look 'close' to what they should be, and the dome is roughly right - but the 7 looks wrong, and overall it just doesn't seem to come together right. Given 7's involvement in the development of the attraction, i'd think something so "front and centre" as the uniform would have nailed the 7 logo perfectly... this hasn't. I have seen a different patch, which was just SP7, rather than 'S7P'... but it's hard to say. by the time I got familiar with wardrobe, the 7 logo had been stripped from the ride so it would have been different anyway.

*cough* insurance job *cough*... No. I don't really mean that. it's a possibility though - the park is growing and the castle looks like something out of the Pirate Movie... it probably needed to go either way... at least this way they might get some money to fund another expansion...

As I recall, the first round VIP pass didn't include fright nights - it was something they decided to do when fright nights rolled around. Sure - it boosted numbers, but at what cost? When Gold was first released - we upgraded immediately. We paid the extra because we saw the value. They've cheapened that value now by offering the free upgrade. Even with our 'gold' passes (now held by about 90% of the people in the park) we still bought fast track. I went on Friday, and in two and a half hours we got one coaster, all 4 mazes, a sit down dinner, all of carnevil and Space Cowboy... in other words - everything that isn't 'normal' about a day-visit to the park (except the coaster). We were on the road at 8:30 (and promptly pulled over for a young idiot with too much power under his foot who had lost his car off the verge of the northbound onramp). So my only experience of fright night was pretty much without queues. We timed our entry to Carnevil perfectly so there was no queue to get in, and we left right on time at the end of the show to walk straight to the front ropes for space cowboy. We also ate dinner a little later at gotham after the crowds were gone without much of a queue (side note - the burgers have gotten much better - i'm tempted to complain about the really small size of the peri peri burger - but we can't have it big and nice at the same time without upping the price so i'm just really impressed with the quality of the small burger I got). Given this experience - I still say there were way too many people in the park - and this is coming from someone who did not have to wait in a single queueline for anything except two people ordering food in front of me which took all of 30 seconds. It's one thing to have that many people in the park, with all 'lands' open, and all rides running at full capacity in peak season, it's another thing to have the overall 'floor area' diminished by the loss of wild west and WB kids (sound stages don't make up for that loss IMO), and still have a peak-season crowd in the park, in the dark, with blinding fog and harsh (or no) lighting in some areas - its just downright dangerous. Despite the complaints of the fog, I found it to be a little too much only in two places - the alley to the soundstages (I think the plastic blood-sheeting prevents the breeze from dissipating it) and in the middle of mainstreet (I think it's just a little too sheltered) - but even then, it wasn't much, and was only for a moment before it began to clear, so overall not something I would complain about personally... but when you combine it with the number of people in the park, along with the extreme darkness (eg: soundstage alley next to arkham's load station) and the blinding lights down mainstreet, these three issues begin to cause a hazard, and it's only a matter of time before someone does a serious injury. That said, I am confident I can now repeat my previously stated opinion, and include 2013 in that opinion, when I say that MW has, once again, improved on their fright night experience in leaps and bounds over previous years, and I urge everyone involved to take the experience (and the extra cash from FastTrack) and throw it into their next big event to make it better than ever before. Edit: I want to restate my opinion on age limits for this thing - we saw families with children barely old enough to be out of a stroller, and witnessed a conversation between a mother and a child under 10 (both of whom had a fast track), with the mother cajoling and encouraging the child to come to the next maze because she had paid for the fast track and wanted to do all four. The boy did not want to, and even said to his mother "you're forcing me to go". I believe they'd just come out of hillbilly slasher (which was probably the best in my opinion for scares - and that lady at the entrance to the house gets better every year), and the mother wanted to do darkness. they hadn't done WD or ED, and the kid was already too scared to do more. I think the best way to age limit these things is to offer a cheaper VIP for under 14s that does not, and cannot receive a fright night entry. the adult ticket should get FN & WC, and the under 14s only WC. Make it cheaper, and all the parents will lie about their children's ages to get the cheaper ticket - and then they won't have a 'free fright night ticket going to waste' because it isn't included.

'only a teen' doesn't excuse you from making an effort. As Wyn suggested, unless the dress code has been specifically stated, try to go with something a little better than a t-shirt and chinos... For example: Try a collar. It's much more presentable. Polo shirt is good, button-down shirt is better, Business-type button down that has been well pressed is best (with long sleeve obviously better ranking than short sleeve). Jeans or chinos are ok - but make sure they're properly ironed. A pair of linen slacks or trousers would be better - but as I said earlier - don't wear something you aren't comfortable in or it will show. Avoid a tie unless you're used to wearing it. Don't wear a tie with a short sleeve shirt unless you're trying to come across as a private schoolboy. At the end of the day though, while these are just my views after years of being on both sides of the interview table, I would expect MW would know their 'staff demographic' and recognise that they do hire a lot of young people, and that those young people don't always have the experience (or the wardrobe) to fit the status quo on interviews... but I still say it can't hurt to make an effort and show them you are willing to go that extra mile to get the job - because that shows you'll go the extra mile IN your job. If they list a contact phone number for enquiries, I'd suggest to call and ask them if there is a dress code without giving your name - they can't hold that against you if they don't know who you are!

Be yourself. If they don't hire you, you weren't right for the job. If they do, you may not last long once the real you comes out. Speak clearly and with confidence. It's ok to pause for a moment after you are asked a question to think about your answer. using phrases like 'hmm, thats a good one' or 'gee it's hard to pick just one' or whatever suits gives you a second or two to think about the question and word it appropriately. Unless the question starts with the words 'tell me about a time when....' then your answer should probably last for around a minute or 2. If you're talking longer than that - have you answered the question or gone off on a tangent? Since we're talking interview tips and techniques - heres another one - always pay close attention to how nice your shoes are. Anyone can get a suit dry cleaned and pressed, but most people won't expend the effort in giving their shoes a good polish - and it shows. I've interviewed people who showed up in immaculate suits and businesswear, but their shoes were grubby, scuffed and unpolished, and that was enough to turn me off them - they're willing to pay someone else to make themselves look presentable but they aren't willing to put the hard effort in themselves suggested to me they weren't motivated... but MOST importantly - polish them BEFORE you shower and dress, otherwise you risk getting polish on your hands, arms, or clothes! (and don't CHEAT and use the black 'paint' polish... get real polish and a polishing brush and do it right, otherwise the shine wears off quickly.)

Whilst I don't speak for any of the gold coast parks personally, you've got to remember that most parks are looking for people who can have fun, whilst still adhering to strict 'on stage' rules. The 'cast member' crowd is almost a fraternity, in many cases with some fairly wild shenanigans going on after hours when people let their hair down - but when it comes to being on stage, you're a performer. Many park recruitment exercises seem to forget this when they're looking to fill many positions, as they take on 'the best of the bunch'... but there might only be 5 who are actually suitable - the rest are just because they need the bodies. I can't really comment on Wyn's situation, but it seems a little weird that someone who knew the spiels so well wouldn't be successful. As for being pushy or impatient - one follow up call 2-3 days after the promised date is enough IMO. If they really like you that much, you'll find out quickly enough (as in Joz's case) Above all, present well, but don't be someone you aren't. If you don't normally wear a suit and tie, you will be uncomfortable during the interview and it will show - same goes for not having properly fitting clothes - collar too tight will make talking an effort and that will show also. When I was called for my Wonderland interview, they advised us to wear smart casual clothing we could move around in - i went with a nice polo and jeans, and given the interview technique, that was probably the best choice. a suit and tie would have been too restrictive for what they asked us to do. Insider tip: most people get nervous during interviews, and tend to sweat. Try to wear colours that don't easily show sweat marks. Whether it's understandable or not - nobody likes to see it, and it certainly can put a guest off seeing a cast member in that situation... if you do tend to sweat it in an interview - go with something discreet!

You say you're in Newcastle... long distance relationship?

This...

One thing to consider though - have we given them a good reason to try and make wait times better? In so many people buying maze fast passes, we've encouraged them to keep the lines as long as possible, as long wait times mean more revenue from those who want to skip the queue, at the expense of people who dont or can't pay the extra. I'm not saying this is something they've done intentionally to make money, but the revenue from these passes would not have a high cost against them - colour printed cards done in bulk by vista print, a couple of hole-punch devices, and a few queue rails organised differently (don't forget the inevitable A-frames). Implementing this idea hasn't cost more than $1-2k, and over 8+ nights at $30 (or $40) a pop, i'm sure they well and truly made a killing. I do sincerely hope that the extra revenue they've generated from the fast pass tickets is reinvested into the event next year and not just absorbed into central revenue, with the same budget attached to next year... if that makes sense?

But who is going to drive them? Bussy certainly isn't going to?

Everyone dumped on the bureau last year when they failed to provide sufficient warning of a hailstorm that hit the Brisbane CBD. Since then they (and other weather centres) have invested a lot of time, effort and money into forecast modelling. Watching the cyclones last year early this year was interesting as each model was predicting a vastly different outcome. But the closer we got to day zero, the more each of the models tended to agree with each other. Theres a reason the BoM releases a storm warning an hour or two out, and not three days prior - because things can change. These advance models are only estimates based on a range of factors. I will be extremely thankful if nothing eventuates out of it, but the facts are simple - it is storm season, and you don't have a storm season without a few storms. I'd much prefer them to put people on an alert level, prompt them to do things like clear gutters and secure outdoor furniture. Hell - i usually leave my upstairs windows open during the day to let the afternoon breezes in - but due to the warning, I closed them all in case the storms hit before i get home. As a member of the QLD State Emergency Service, believe me when I say we appreciate every minute of advanced warning we can get - it helps more households be prepared, and it also helps us to put our employers on notice 'a storm may be coming, I might need to leave work unexpectedly' so when they see us run out the door, they know why. Most of my colleagues (and bosses) look to me to give them info on storms because of what we do - but our information is no different to the rest of them - we just watch it a little closer.

Remember, in most cases they're looking for people who can make things fun. Answer the questions seriously, but always with a smile. When I went for my interview with Wonderland many years ago, they did it as a group. Split us up into groups of 4, gave us a random product to sell (none of which were easy) and asked us to come up with a high energy TV advertisement to sell the product - each of us had to speak for at least a minute. While we were brainstorming, one of the interviewers came around, heard us talking about taking the mickey out of Tim Shaw and his old Demtel ads - his eyes lit up and he told us 'yeah you have to use that'... 5 minutes of high energy fast talking about a book on australian native plants never sounded so good, and our group of 4 were the only group that all 4 of us got through to the next stage.

See that doesn't make sense to me. they're going to try a hallowe'en scare attraction, and debut it 2 days after the month is over? In my opinion, October is the month you can get away with Hallowe'en - they should have maybe had it last weekend as well. (Yes, MW is hosting a FN event on 1 November, but that was never planned, and only added due to the sell-out crowds they've had)

It's a great shot, but i'm disappointed you chose Greezed Lightnin over Montezooma.

One thing i'm wondering (and I really don't mean to be pessimistic) but are Perth park-goers less likely to damage queue lines? Or is it likely this awesome theming will be reduced to graffiti and broken foam in 6 months? (or worse yet - put behind bars). It's great that they've stood-off the queue rails a good distance, but in a long wait that won't discourage visitors from ducking the rails and picking playing with it... I hope they have some cameras in there...