DaptoFunlandGuy

I think you're on the money Danaant. There is no reason to install anything else except for capacity reasons, which while being hit now, would need to be consistent for the rest of the season to warrant it. Bussy - there has been a lot of rhetoric that attractions have been closed because they did not have the staff to man them - eg - the lazy river. Not saying it's true, but it has been said a lot. Regarding the NYE Festival - HOLY SHIT... to get this close to the date and cancel? Thats a bit rough... going to be a lot of pissed off people who have no other plans for New Years Eve....

Sea World - work continues on Wild. Opening date pushed back to 2037. Wet n Wild - Park begins 'attraction swapping' like Six Flags. The GC gets a second constrictor from Sydney to handle demand, Sydney gets more polite locals from the GC to ease pressure on Gate Staff when the park hits capacity. Movie World - Work at last begins to install a coaster into the Western Show Stage. Dreamworld - Introduces a new paint colour called "cover up the dilapidated wood rot on all our 30 year old buildings that are lacking in good maintenance except for Dreamworks or we'll lose the licensing agreement purple" Aussie World will introduce another small, low budget, but still solid attraction that will see a continued increase in guest numbers, satisfaction, and interest from the enthusiast community. Clive palmer will try to buy it, and the entire upper balcony of the Ettamogah Pub will give him the finger. Adventure World will ride the wave of their massive 2013 installation, but may announce something a little smaller to fit with the currently empty wallet once their massive attendance increase has been accounted for in the till. Jamberoo will continue to plod along with their master plan, installing slides as planned for the past 7 years, completely oblivious to the 'at capacity' waterpark over an hour away. Scenic World will continue to talk about re-engineering the Orphan Rocker 'someday'. Will instead come up with a fourth transport ride to take you into over the same valley you've already seen from 3 different angles. Pinksmile will find a way to gain access to the counterweight, and will chain himself to it in protest. Luna Park Sydney will consider building a permanent attraction behind coney island - will instead introduce 8 different flats for the year - only during school holidays. Luna Park Melbourne will introduce 2 new flats, and will announce the refurbishment of the entire Melbourne metropolitan area by Mack Rides. In broader waterpark news - VRTP will announce a Wet N Wild for every state and territory in Australia - including the Australian Antarctic Territory. All parks hit capacity in their first three months despite being labelled 'ripoffs' by locals. Ardent reduces WWW park capacity to 500 people. Hits capacity 4 times in January. As for the big 'two' corporations - VRTP continue to produce outstanding attractions and extremely good value for money with even more christmas and hallowe'en events, and a new 'christmas in july event'. Ardent announces passholders will now get free entry to SkyDeck all year round - attendance remains unchanged. In other news, Sea World applies to the Gold Coast City Council for a relaxation of height restrictions, so that they can make the 'no entry' gate next to the retail plaza even higher, WetnWild announces that fat people do in fact ride waterslides, releasing a fact sheet so that people know that other large guests have already been on it without embarassment, Movie World reduces it's height restrictions to the same limits placed by the manufacturers, in line with worldwide standards - and also removes unnecessary restraint redundancies and time consuming loading procedures. They also buy a second train for Arkham Asylum. Dreamworld hires scuba divers to repaint the captain sturt - which will be by then resting gently on the bottom of the murrisippi.

Just down the road from me, a large franchised car dealership opened up a new dealership. A few blocks away is an old abandoned car dealership that went out of business 8 years ago, that has been up for sale ever since. That car dealership should have just bought the old lot, instead of building a brand new one the way they wanted it... right?

Yes, let's tell them to extend a ride they've just finished spending big bucks on to make shorter, in order to fit in a multimillion dollar new attraction? I doubt they'd take you seriously on anything. As for telling them it's worse - how? We all pointed out the safety issue that someone could hurt themselves... since they've been made aware of the hazard - they do ahead and rectify the hazard by increasing the height of the barriers so that nobody jumps the fence anymore... How can we possibly tell them that it's worse? Are taller people injuring themselves now? Are birds being decapitated by the wires?

yep - seems to need the youtu.be link included contrary to the original post.

Putting poor spelling and grammar aside for a minute - VRTP was a very different beast in 2004. With the exception of the 3 anchor attractions on the gold coast, the expansions that VRTP have delved into have mostly been water parks - which are generally cheaper and lower risk. VRTP was not in a position to spend the money necessary to 'save wonderland'. Believe me - there wasn't much anyone could have done to save it. Wonderland was not the kind of park to take on - it was built sprawled out across much more land than was necessary. The park could have been condensed at least twice over without much bother. It also wasn't the right time to be operating a standalone theme park in western sydney. Despite all the other reasons for closure - the public reasons given by Stephen Galbraith were quite real effects on tourism including SARS Bird Swine Flu, Terrorism, and entering into a new business venture at that time was probably not the best investment opportunity. Doing the math though, a September-April season works out to be about an average of 3750 people per day... To hit that magic number with a december opening only increases it to around 5000 per day. With park capacity at 22,000 - around 4 times the amount required, and likely to hit that frequently for two months solid - they'll hit a million visitors before February. Naturally they won't hit capacity every day, but they'll meet attendance targets without an issue. My question is - how much land is around there if they wanted to build other parks in close proximity?

i'd leave Jet Rescue until last - Vikings gets busy quite quickly, and it's loading is more efficient than Vikings is...

no - i'm posting it just like it says at the top of this thread - [youtube]pP5CdRiY8Ak[/youtube]

i said the type of person - not the actual person. $99 for a family of four, or $25 per person is nicely comparable, when it comes to $79.95 for a day entry to the GC parks, or WnWS... thats one third of the price...

Why doesn't this code work anymore? I can't seem to post videos using the BBcode button or the [ you tube ] codes - but others can...? Using standard youtube embed code doesn't work either...

I get the feeling you're the type of person that was down in Sydney whinging about the price of WnWS tickets, and claiming you won't go because of the price. Time will tell but if it proves popular enough - it will get the people. If it isn't - then the price will come down. Either way - they spent the money, they built it, it's not public land, so they can charge whatever they want. http://youtu.be/pP5CdRiY8Ak http://youtu.be/pP5CdRiY8Ak

Fact #1 - most people think that the last thing they ate was what caused their illness. Fact #2 - in many of those cases, it wasn't, and it can take (sometimes) days for any food borne illness to take hold as your immune system delays the response. Fact #3 - Although things like chicken and pork can be home to a host of nasties, almost every protein can fall victim to these sorts of bacteria regardless of handling technique. In what was most likely a buffet style meal (and most likely served outdoors given WnW doesn't have function rooms) there are inherent risks associated with buffet style dining - insects can also play a part. You'd have to be superman to keep the food absolutely 100% free from any worry. A slightly pink leg does not indicate it is undercooked. Chicken Thigh Leg will always be a little 'pink' - especially if you compare it to breast meat. Because most chicken we eat comes from the breast, we freak out when we see a blood spot (happens regularly) or thigh meat that is a little pinker. Unless your husband works in food standards and safety, or is responsible for the maintenance of a commercial kitchen - he's got no idea what he's talking about - and you don't either - because you didn't notice it until after you had finished eating it. You describe your feeling as you looked at the bone, and thats all I need to confirm your feeling was psychosomatic and nothing more. You were likely beginning to feel ill from something you ate earlier, and your mind preferred to settle on the slightly pink chicken you ate moments prior. Given your recent pregnancy and continued breast feeding you were, as you say, sticking to a strict diet... however this implies most if not all your food was prepared at home - Is your home regularly inspected by the department of health? Are you required to maintain food standards to a saleable state? Probably not. More likely - your 'strict diet' had poor food standards and you made yourself sick. Without medical reports, pathology or other evidence - I call bullshit. You're in the wrong place. *Side note - if you've been adhering to a very strict diet for several months, and then suddenly introduce something different to your system, it will cause diarrhea regardless of whether it is well cooked or not*

even if they're doing the same behaviours, it will be different purely because the juveniles aren't as well trained as the adults were.

Regardless of where the development is now, the renderings were done back when it was a two-bit proposal by a development guy. From what I understand it has grown from that but nobody has updated the renderings yet. If they manage to get enough thrust to hover off the ground, i dare say they'd throw in a better plan and really begin working on it... I doubt we're going to see a 'wonderland' theme park, more of a citywalk downtown disney to start with to anchor it and get some revenue flowing, and then bringing on more attractions and infrastructure as time allows. The key now will be to leverage off WnW so they need to build somewhere within relatively close proximity to it.

In this season, Q4U will be invaluable at a park with such shitty capacity and operations. You should get through them all without too much issue. Considering how much SFMM charge for their platinum flash pass - $75 for DW isn't bad.

there seems to be an EXTREMELY large gap between Green Lantern and the front entrance...

You get wet regardless of the dump bucket... so that has nothing to do with it.

No worries. I'm not trying to say your view of Fantasmic is incorrect, just pointing out the error in your critique. You said the fact that the story was in Mickey's dream was never properly explained - I think the introduction makes it clear that what we're seeing is Mickey's dream imagination. The finale where Mickey overcomes the forces of evil is prefaced by him saying "you may think you're so powerful... but this is MY dream" (*boom) Also - the only other counter point i'd offer - is since when is a dream ever coherent or anything BUT abstract? I'd say it's intentionally abstract by design on the basis that it is inside a dream. When was the last time you had a dream which made perfect sense? I've seen Fantasmic only once - but filmed the whole thing. I have the soundtrack to it also, and on occasion listen to the entire 26 minute show on repeat, so i'm fairly familiar with the audio side of the storyline. Fantasmic is a show of good vs. evil - like pretty much EVERY bloody Disney product imaginable. Like most Disney things, it plays strongly on it's encouragement of your dreams or imagination - they are powerful and emotive words. This discussion is about our theme park websites - so i'll quit highjacking it, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantasmic#Synopsis gives a pretty good description of the show from start to finish, and the segues and transitions are spelt out clearly for what they are... have a read and see if the show makes more sense.

I see the logic in that, but if that is the case, explain to me why they introduced 'buy 3 get one free' gold passes, and made the offer retrospective to include those who had already purchased 3 or 4? If that move was planned from the get-go, why make the offer retrospective? On a side note, i dislike posting rumors (*which at the moment this is) but I am seeking truth - an unofficial facebook page about the park posted that there was a near-drowning incident there yesterday - details i've read* are sketchy at best, but from what I can gather so far - a 2 year old was unattended not 'constantly' supervised in the wave pool and was taken from the water unconscious. Lifeguards on duty were able to resuscitate and she is currently at Westmead recovering. Additionally, the info suggests this is not the first "near-drown" since the park has been open. *the info comes from facebook comments, so we know thats 100% reliable (not), so don't shoot the messenger, i'm just repeating what was said. I don't claim that any of this is fact, i'm posting this to seek confirmation from others who may have better or more reliable information. (If anyone has anything to say about this - I ask that you refrain from aiming criticism at the park or the lifeguards, neither of which are babysitters or able to watch 22,000 people on their own, but should be congratulated on their quick action to revive the child. At the same time - feel free to aim any critique squarely on the shoulders of the parents who should never have let go of the childs hand whilst in the water)

The park's attendance numbers were propped up by busloads of asian tourists who came for the koala photo, australiana, and the leg stretch on the way to Katoomba at severely discounted rates for group bookings. Attendance was not a reflection of profitability for that park for some time.

Fair enough - I haven't seen serpent slayer (obviously), but I take issue with you saying the concept of fantasmic is somehow never properly explained... The original name of the show was 'Imagination'. The narration to the show starts with: "Welcome to Fantasmic! Tonight, your friend and host Mickey Mouse uses his vivid imagination to create magical imagery for all to enjoy. Nothing is more wonderful than the imagination. For, in a moment, you an experience a beautiful fantasy. Or, an exciting adventure! But beware -- nothing is more powerful than the imagination. For it can also expand your greatest fears into an overwhelming nightmare. Are the powers of Mickey's incredible imagination strong enough, and bright enough, to withstand the evil forces that invade Mickey's dreams? You are about to find out. For we now invite you to join Mickey, and experience Fantasmic! a journey beyond your wildest imagination." (which can be heard at 27 seconds here: http://youtu.be/8SQ1LHojUNQ?t=27s The theme song's chorus also goes: See it... in your mind, and you will find, in your imagination... mysteries and magic, visions fantastic, leading to strange and wondrous dreams. Dreams, of make believe, but will they all come true... I wouldn't say the cast aren't 'visually interesting' in their appearance, and while I agree they do spend a little too much time on the water screens, a lot of what they have can't be represented by actors in a meaningful way... except perhaps Ursula, but from what I understand, the Ursula float used to have too many problems to be reliable, and she played up so much they decided just to stick with the projection than to hinge the show each night on whether she would work that night or not.

I don't think the park hitting capacity in it's first month of operation - even consistently - is not an appropriate comparison to the success or failure of Wonderland. Theres a few other things to take into account - Wonderland wasn't JUST a waterpark operating 6 months of the year. Slides cost significantly less to maintain and operate Wonderland was almost 20 years old and the lustre had rubbed off the park... let's see how this park is in 19 years time. There were other factors contributing to Wonderland's closure that weren't directly attributable to 'the market not being there' also.

For you to say this, Joz.... I have to see the video!

How dare they put guest safety above guest happiness. They should run all their rides no matter what the weather. who cares if someone gets electrocuted - that was just bad luck for randomly being on it when it struck, right? No - the family would sue the park for recklessness, and they'd win, and then the park would be closed down. The old adage - it's better to be safe than sorry.

there was a storm in LTRR?