Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Its been done before here on the Gold Coast. Sea World was full of sponsorships. Anyone remember Bermuda Triangle? It says Paul/Norco there, but I have a memory of it being sponsored by Banana Boat, but maybe that was another ride in the park. Or the Sky High Skyway sponsored by Qantas.
  3. Yeah they don't say it. Show venues typically would include announced sponsorships before \ after the show, but attractions would just be branded. Think the Pepsi Big One at Blackpool. It can be done tastefully and very unobtrusively while still getting the brand some exposure and the park some funds... I skimmed around for a few examples from the big majors to show what I mean Bonus points if the sponsor can be integrated into the ride in a clever way - like a tea company sponsoring a teacup ride So some examples I can think of locally: Murrisippi Motors, presented by Ampol Gold Coaster, presented by City of Gold Coast \ Gold Coast Tourism board TailSpin, presented by Virgin Australia Jet Rescue, presented by Lifesavers Battle Boats, presented by SuperSoaker The Rip, presented by RipCurl Superman Escape, presented by Translink Roxy Theatre, presented by Event Cinemas (i'm aware village is part owner) Steel Taipan, presented by BHP Australia Wild West Falls, presented by Old El Paso While related sponsors are great, generic corporates with big pockets love to stick their brand on things too. Coca Cola, Samsung, Woolworths. As long as it's not a ridiculous branding, (please don't wrap the coaster trains) and it's mutually beneficial, I don't see any reason why we can't see sponsorship across the parks.
  4. Loosing an attraction for the show is a shame, but the events space is only used for ice skating, a wiggles show once a year and a very occasional boxing match for the night markets. 90% of the year that building is unused, so I see it as a positive to use it for the house. Really puts the house in the park and opens them up for opportunities to promote the show heavily in park and potential house tours in the summer (without the kilometre hike to get it to)
  5. So we're losing Gold Coaster and an event venue. That's a bit disappointing.
  6. Today
  7. King Claw eyes were lit up this morning, looks a little lacklustre, hopefully more to come, eyes colour is a purplish colour.
  8. Looks like the Dreamworld Express will be under maintenance from 15-19th September. I’m going to assume this will be to complete necessary testing etc before opening the full circuit for the Sep school holidays? Does anyone know is this enough time to test and open the new track section? Also very curious to see if the 3rd station returns (Rivertown) I am hopeful it will. The other two stations had works completed to raise the platform height, however these works have not occurred on the 3rd station as yet, hard to think there’s enough time left to do that before hols which makes me think perhaps the 3rd station won’t return just yet.
  9. Supports and slide pieces are currently being installed for the new slide tower, crane has been on site all week.
  10. I’m a big fan of big brother coming to dreamworld but removing the events space which has held the Happy Halloween event bothers me
  11. I'm leaning towards it being BB related. I know you could easily hear Gold Coaster in the exhibition centre - very loud and made the building even shake.
  12. I'm glad they don't. Can you imagine if the corperate overlords made them say the full name everytime they said the name? "Justice League: Alien Invasion 3D presented by Village Roadshow Themeparks" would have gotten older than Benjamin Button alot quicker.
  13. Small point, but it's the Australian Geographic Society - publishing Australian Geographic magazine. NatGeo is National Geograpic, magazine and Cable TV channel - now (partially) owned by Disney. Similar organisations, easily confused. But it's a good fit for Dreamworld and will probably make it a lot easier for them to build out educational experiences, since Aus Geo has the magazine/Awards and is associated with Northern Pictures so they effectively have a production arm to lean on.
  14. If that is the reason, then it's stupid, and i'm siding with Dean Barnett. Seatbelts have been mandatory in Australia since 1972 so people shouldn't be having too many difficulties with them. Operators check seatbelts prior to dispatch, so an unsecured seatbelt would be identified, and the train quickly reset, and restraints re-checked. The amount of time this takes, on the rare occasion that someone is incapable of operating a seatbelt would be far less than the additional time it adds to every dispatch for an operator to do it up for each and every rider. Then again airlines still have to show people how to operate seatbelts, so maybe there are too many lowest common denominators at our parks these days.
  15. The main reason why this is the case, is actually due to the seatbelts locking pin. If a guest puts the clasp in incorrectly, doesn't fully latch and then removes it, the locking pin was potentially triggered and pushed up into place. That means that the clasp can't get past it, and lock into place. Only way to resolve that, is to reset, and start the process again.
  16. I think the logic is that if a fault could befall one method of locking - if both methods are the same, the fault could theoretically befall both at the same time, whereas different methods can't fail in the same way so the likelihood that one cause could trigger both to fail is far less likely, even though the likelihood of either occurring is infinitesimally small. ie: if both hydraulic locking cylinders have a manufacturing defect, theoretically both cylinders could fail at the same time. Further - it's not technically possible to detect that one cylinder has failed during normal operation - so an operator wouldn't know one had failed until the other failed too. This is the main reason why we have coasters where they tell you not to do up your seatbelt, so the operator can perform a push-pull test on the cylinder before attaching the SRS seatbelt.
  17. SafeWork SA have had bans overturned in the past. I'm starting to think not only do they have to be independent but they have to be different types of locking mechanism.
  18. Yesterday
  19. From what I have heard it's because the KMG rides do not have a seatbelt / secondary locking mechanism. Which the ride actually does as each of the 2 hydraulic systems for the harnesses are 100% independent of each other. SA is the only state where this rule applies. It's a real shame as SA misses out on some great rides that are 100% safe.
  20. I agree you can't replace the in-person handlers - especially when they get mauled by a wild animal. I think the handler interactions, and especially the presentations, with leaps off high structures, climbing a pole, launching into water, drinking from a milk carton - all were spectacular to watch. And while the guff in the script talks about mimicking natural behaviours, in the wild, their natural behaviours would see those handlers killed. I am disappointed that they have ended the handler interactions, but in our risk elimination focussed world, there really isn't another option.
  21. The island was more than the show. The handlers on the island all day, interacting with the tigers and guest, can never be replaced by looking at tigers through a window.
  22. I agree @DaptoFunlandGuy, DW is starting to get some good foot traffic through the park now, it would be a shame if DW were purposefully closing an experience.
  23. I don't know if every sign has been replaced yet because the image I posted was from the school across the road who were invited for the opening. When DW first opened, every ride had a sponsorship.
  24. I mean series one housemates could see and hear the tower of terror. I get that it's not ideal but deliberately shutting down a very visible coaster for the sake of filming the show is very poor form. The ride is old however - it's entirely plausible that they've got a major maintenance issue to deal with and all that is just a coincidence... at least I hope so. They've been making a lot of good decisions recently so I'd hate for them to be taking such a backwards step.
  25. Gold Coaster was supposed to reopen next week, so either something has gone majorly wrong or the rumours that Big Brother will be on the expansion area behind WWW are true. BB is returning in November and will air for 4-6 weeks, having a loud coaster operating next to the show wouldn’t be ideal, so it’s reopening aligns with that. They have also fenced off the entire back corner of the park after Tailspin, which is allowing them to do some work inside the Entertainment Centre.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.