Jump to content

John Longhurst's Dreamworld Stories


Slick
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Another fascinating article @Roachie!

It was interesting reading about John Longhurst's post-1989 plans for DW. It's not stated in your article but do you know if Wipeout was one of his ideas too? The only discrepancy being that Wipeout was put in the middle of Country Fair rather than a new area or an existing area that was more related to the ride's theme like Blue Lagoon. It doesn't seem to match John Longhurst's attention to detail.

The former Gravitron/Vortex & Skylink Chairlift may have been his ideas too particularly as there are no discrepancies there. Do you know if they were his ideas too? (I know Skylink Chairlift came from the nearby former Magic Mountain theme park but there is a 2 year period between that theme park's closure and Skylink Chairlift's opening at DW (3 months after he sold DW) - maybe during those 2 years he thought that would be a great addition to DW?)

Edited by Jamberoo Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good write up, but a shame that little information about his recent visit would be disclosed. Surely not all of it would have a reference to the rapids incident. Many comments such as friendliness of staff, current rides and attractions under maintenance and the quality of current attraction offerings could have been mentioned. One question that was floating through my head was... "I wonder if he had to pay for a ticket full price during 2017?".

Also thought there were going to be interviews from previous engineers and opening day staff? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jamberoo Fan said:

Another fascinating article @Roachie!

It was interesting reading about John Longhurst's post-1989 plans for DW. It's not stated in your article but do you know if Wipeout was one of his ideas too? The only discrepancy being that Wipeout was put in the middle of Country Fair rather than a new area or an existing area that was more related to the ride's theme like Blue Lagoon. It doesn't seem to match John Longhurst's attention to detail.

The former Gravitron/Vortex & Skylink Chairlift may have been his ideas too particularly as there are no discrepancies there. Do you know if they were his ideas too? (I know Skylink Chairlift came from the nearby former Magic Mountain theme park but there is a 2 year period between that theme park's closure and Skylink Chairlift's opening at DW (3 months after he sold DW) - maybe during those 2 years he thought that would be a great addition to DW?)

Cheers mate!

The Wipeout was installed as part of Ernst & Young's / IOOF Friendly Society's plan to get Dreamworld out of receivership after Bruce Jenkins' vision didn't go to plan - basically it didn't have anything to do with John. Same with the chairlift - according to John he had nothing to do with it's installation and was one of the things Bruce did.

11 hours ago, webslave said:

Well capped-off, Roachie.  I know feel I know a great deal more about a park I was only dimly aware of the history of, and a man I knew nothing of.  Thankyou.

I think a lot of people are similar in that regard - John's understandably very private these days and as we all get older more and more of what was originally there is bulldozed, archived or just lost. It's a real shame.

22 minutes ago, themeparkaddict said:

A good write up, but a shame that little information about his recent visit would be disclosed. Surely not all of it would have a reference to the rapids incident. Many comments such as friendliness of staff, current rides and attractions under maintenance and the quality of current attraction offerings could have been mentioned. One question that was floating through my head was... "I wonder if he had to pay for a ticket full price during 2017?".

Also thought there were going to be interviews from previous engineers and opening day staff? 

I think what he didn't say speaks louder than what he did. I definitely have the intention of doing more projects like this in the future - this isn't the last piece by any stretch, but one step at a time.

And yeah, he paid just like everyone else. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Roachie thanks so much for bringing this to us. A story that is totally underrated, have you thought about reaching a much bigger Audience with it?

Also this:

"but the best part [of owning it again] would be the excitement of doing it, because it was doing a beautiful thing.”

- suggests to me that he still hasn't entirely ruled out the idea of buying DW back?Maybe he should get you to help him run it @Roachie?

Edited by MickeyD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MickeyD said:

@Roachie thanks so much for bringing this to us. A story that is totally underrated, have you thought about reaching a much bigger Audience with it?

Also this:

"but the best part [of owning it again] would be the excitement of doing it, because it was doing a beautiful thing.”

- suggests to me that he still hasn't entirely ruled out the idea of buying DW back?Maybe he should get you to help him run it @Roachie?

There's definitely some stuff in the works to bring it to a bigger audience, but it's early stages.

I might have to get John back down to the park and see what they're up to - maybe that'll inspire him?

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jamberoo Fan said:

So did the same apply with Gravitron/Vortex?

My logic would say it was after John's time.  The Demon from Expo didn't open for 3 years at Wonderland after the fun park closed.  Even thou the park closed in 89 I believe they didn't sell the rides straight away.

Fun fact about the Gravitron while the ride was at Expo it was involved in an accident.  The door was ripped off when the operator opened the door at too high of a speed and somehow it made contact with the shed it was in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Skeeta said:

Fun fact about the Gravitron while the ride was at Expo it was involved in an accident.  The door was ripped off when the operator opened the door at too high of a speed and somehow it made contact with the shed it was in.

Fact or Lore?

Assuming the gravitron was a standard 'starship 3000' style pod - and my memory suggests it was - the door swung up and inwards. The structure had support beams overhead, which would be the upper envelope - and the door did not rise as high as the support beams (remember of course that riders would stand with backs to the wall, and at speed, those walls would slide up - so the roof itself was already quite high - i can't see the door exceeding the roof framework - especially since many travelling models had a vinyl roof spread over those support beams.

Hope i've explained that well enough...

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiPg-XbtoTdAhUYAogKHQ1cCSkQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.funlandrehoboth.com%2Fgmedia-album%2Ftesting%2F%3Fgm9[album__in]%3D1&psig=AOvVaw1pDzaEk-ew_2pn-XUGQGTz&ust=1535156628553296

 

image.thumb.png.13b30fcb3d37831e84c0150a9df4c101.png

in the pic above, the door isn't fully opened as yet - but the additional height above the visible frame, which permitted the walls to slide upwards, would give the door quite a large clearance when open. I can't see the door physically exceeding the bounds of the ride frame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlexB said:

Fact or Lore?

Assuming the gravitron was a standard 'starship 3000' style pod - and my memory suggests it was - the door swung up and inwards. The structure had support beams overhead, which would be the upper envelope - and the door did not rise as high as the support beams (remember of course that riders would stand with backs to the wall, and at speed, those walls would slide up - so the roof itself was already quite high - i can't see the door exceeding the roof framework - especially since many travelling models had a vinyl roof spread over those support beams.

Hope i've explained that well enough...

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiPg-XbtoTdAhUYAogKHQ1cCSkQjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.funlandrehoboth.com%2Fgmedia-album%2Ftesting%2F%3Fgm9[album__in]%3D1&psig=AOvVaw1pDzaEk-ew_2pn-XUGQGTz&ust=1535156628553296

 

image.thumb.png.13b30fcb3d37831e84c0150a9df4c101.png

in the pic above, the door isn't fully opened as yet - but the additional height above the visible frame, which permitted the walls to slide upwards, would give the door quite a large clearance when open. I can't see the door physically exceeding the bounds of the ride frame

Thank you for you're research @AlexBbut it was pointless. 😝

1. The door was opened while the ride was traveling fast

2. The door isn't designed to be opened at high speeds. 

3. I believe the hinges twisted.

4. It didn't come in contact with the top of the shed it came into contact with the side of the shed.

 

 

Edited by Skeeta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

your*

 

Thanks - i'd missed the detail that it detatched (you did say ripped off, but i assumed that was as a result of striking the shed, rather than the cause of it striking the shed). the detail about the hinges, as well as it striking the wall, rather than the roof makes perfect sense.

thanks, i couldn't get it the right way around in my mind.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.